Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 26;52(Pt 2):369–377. doi: 10.1107/S1600576719002012

Table 1. Results of fits to equatorial SANS intensities from wet and dry wood samples, with fixed parameters marked with asterisks.

Sample A Inline graphic (nm) Inline graphic a (nm) Δa/a B σ (× 10−2) C (× 10−7) α
Birch, wet 3.2 ± 0.5 2.16 ± 0.05 0.2* 3.1 ± 0.2 0.46 ± 0.05 6.4 ± 0.5 2.2 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.4 4.4 ± 0.2
Birch, dry 0.09 ± 0.03 2.0* 0.2* 2.27 ± 0.09 0.26 ± 0.02 0.6 ± 0.3 1.2 ± 0.2 1.2 ± 0.5 4.02 ± 0.04
Pine, wet 1.7 ± 0.4 2.04 ± 0.02 0.2* 4.21 ± 0.04 0.271 ± 0.006 2.4 ± 0.9 1.48 ± 0.04 0.31 ± 0.07 4.34 ± 0.06
Pine, dry 0.03 ± 0.01 2.0* 0.2* 3.3 ± 0.2 0.21 ± 0.03 0.03 ± 0.01 3.6 ± 0.7 0.4 ± 0.2 4.13 ± 0.02
Spruce, wet 1.6 ± 0.3 2.07 ± 0.01 0.2* 4.23 ± 0.02 0.31 ± 0.01 2.5 ± 0.2 1.51 ± 0.03 0.08 ± 0.02 4.8 ± 0.2
Spruce, dry 0.04 ± 0.01 2.0* 0.2* 2.91 ± 0.05 0.23 ± 0.03 0.09 ± 0.05 3.4 ± 0.9 0.5 ± 0.1 4.21 ± 0.07