Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 26;52(Pt 2):369–377. doi: 10.1107/S1600576719002012

Table 2. Results of fits to equatorial SAXS intensities from wet and dry wood samples.

Sample A (× 103) Inline graphic (nm) Inline graphic a (nm) Δa/a B (× 103) σ (× 10−2) C (× 10−3) α
Birch, wet 1.0 ± 0.3 2.4 ± 0.2 0.23 ± 0.03 3.74 ± 0.04 0.51 ± 0.04 0.7 ± 0.5 3.2 ± 0.3 0.2 ± 0.1 3.86 ± 0.08
Birch, dry 0.16 ± 0.08 2.2 ± 0.2 0.21 ± 0.02 3.19 ± 0.06 0.38 ± 0.04 0.3 ± 0.1 8.7 ± 0.5 0.7 ± 0.4 4.10 ± 0.01
Pine, wet 1.5 ± 0.4 2.51 ± 0.02 0.207 ± 0.003 3.75 ± 0.05 0.41 ± 0.01     0.04 ± 0.03 4.2 ± 0.2
Pine, dry 0.3 ± 0.1 2.19 ± 0.07 0.24 ± 0.01 3.31 ± 0.06 0.300 ± 0.008 0.47 ± 0.09 7.4 ± 0.2 4 ± 1 3.76 ± 0.02
Spruce, wet 1.0 ± 0.3 2.46 ± 0.02 0.222 ± 0.002 4.1 ± 0.2 0.460 ± 0.003     0.04 ± 0.04 4.5 ± 0.2
Spruce, dry 0.13 ± 0.06 2.1 ± 0.1 0.253 ± 0.005 3.2 ± 0.1 0.35 ± 0.01 0.25 ± 0.03 8.0 ± 0.3 4 ± 2 3.98 ± 0.04