Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 19;61(3):607–615. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4519-5

Table 2.

Differences in estimated glycaemic deterioration rates in individuals with type 2 diabetes

Variable n Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Unadjusted coefficient
(95% CI)a
p value Adjusted coefficient
(95% CI)b
p value
Age, years
  <50 823 1.80 (1.63, 1.97) <0.0001 1.67 (1.49, 1.85) <0.0001
  50–<60 1430 0.96 (0.81, 1.11) <0.0001 0.89 (0.74, 1.04) <0.0001
  60–<70 1820 0.42 (0.28, 0.57) <0.0001 0.38 (0.24, 0.52) <0.0001
  ≥70 1269 REF REF
Sex
  Male 3013 0.14 (0.03, 0.25) 0.0107 0.06 (−0.04, 0.17) 0.2370
  Female 2329 REF REF
Year diagnosed
  <2001 1567 1.50 (1.33, 1.67) <0.0001 1.55 (1.39, 1.72) <0.0001
  2001–<2003 1318 0.36 (0.26, 0.45) <0.0001 0.38 (0.28, 0.48) <0.0001
  2003–<2006 1263 0.10 (0.03, 0.16) 0.0021 0.10 (0.04, 0.17) 0.0010
  ≥2006 1194 REF REF
Baseline HbA1c >64 mmol/mol:
  No 3574 REF REF
  Yes 1768 0.19 (0.08, 0.31) 0.0017 0.07 (−0.04, 0.18) 0.2300
BMI (kg/m2):
  <25 533 −0.08 (−0.28, 0.11) 0.4008 0.05 (−0.14, 0.23) 0.6387
  25–<30 1890 REF REF
  30–<35 1703 0.20 (0.07, 0.33) 0.0023 0.07 (−0.05, 0.20) 0.2371
  35–<40 774 0.27 (0.10, 0.44) 0.0016 −0.02 (−0.19, 0.14) 0.7887
  ≥40 442 0.76 (0.55, 0.97) <0.0001 0.26 (0.06, 0.47) 0.0128
HDL-cholesterol (mmol/l):
  <1 1275 0.60 (0.44, 0.76) <0.0001 0.21 (0.05, 0.38) 0.0107
  1–<1.2 1524 0.41 (0.25, 0.56) <0.0001 0.18 (0.03, 0.34) 0.0188
  1.2–<1.4 1168 0.15 (−0.01, 0.32) 0.0673 0.03 (−0.13, 0.19) 0.7291
  ≥1.4 1119 REF REF
  Missing 256 0.01 (−0.25, 0.26) 0.9266 −0.17 (−0.42, 0.09) 0.1850
Triacylglycerol (mmol/l):
  <1.5 790 REF REF
  1.5–<2.5 1391 0.08 (−0.10 to 0.26) 0.4173 −0.01 (−0.18, 0.17) 0.9315
  2.5–<3.5 858 0.16 (−0.03, 0.36) 0.1110 −0.04 (−0.23, 0.15) 0.6677
  ≥3.5 819 0.36 (0.16, 0.56) 0.0005 −0.03 (−0.22, 0.17) 0.7767
  Missing 1484 −0.03 (−0.21, 0. 51) 0.7477 0.07 (−0.11, 0.24) 0.4402

aUnits are mmol/mol HbA1c per year, adjusted only for glucose-lowering medication, steroid use and change in BMI

bUnits are mmol/mol HbA1c per year, adjusted for glucose-lowering medication, steroid use, change in BMI, age at diagnosis, sex, year diagnosed, baseline HbA1c group, BMI, triacylglycerols and HDL-cholesterol

Values are expressed as the absolute difference in progression rate between the study group and the reference group. Positive values mean that the glycaemic deterioration rate is faster than the reference group