Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 27;61(5):1112–1123. doi: 10.1007/s00125-018-4572-8

Table 3.

 SNPs containing cis eQTLs

Chr SNP Locus for FSI GWAS eQTLa FSIb Lipolysisb Insulin-stimulated lipogenesisb WAT morphologyb
Effect allele Gene Effect allele p value Effect size p value R p value R p value R p value R
2 rs2972143 Intergenic G IRS1 G 8.0 × 10−8 −0.29 2.8 × 10−5c 3.4 × 10−4c + 3.3 × 10−2
4 rs3822072 Intronic A FAM13A G 4.0 × 10−6 0.24 5.6 × 10−12c 5.6 × 10−7c 1.6 × 10−2 + 8.2 × 10−4c
6 rs6912327 Intronic T UHRF1BP1 C 2.0 × 10−25 0.51 1.1 × 10−2
T SNRPC C 3.3 × 10−10 −0.28
7 rs1167800 Intronicd A STAG3L1 A 3.3 × 10−10 −0.28
A TRIM73 A 5.2 × 10−8 −0.34 1.5 × 10−2c
A POM121C A 3.6 × 10−7 −0.22 2.0 × 10−2c 3.4 × 10−3c + 2.6 × 10−2
A PMS2P3 A 6.1 × 10−11 −0.41 8.0 × 10−3 4.8 × 10−2

aSAT eQTL according to GTEx portal

bMicroarray results from the clinical cohort were analysed by regression in QLUCORE, adjusting for array batch, and for WAT morphology, adjusting for age. Only results with p < 0.05 are shown

cFDR <5%

dIntronic in the HIP1 gene

R, regression coefficient, which can be either positive (+) or negative (−)