Table 3. Root causes in reported human pathogen or toxin exposure incidents, Canada 2017 (N=101).
| Root cause | Areas of concern | Citations | |
|---|---|---|---|
| n | % | ||
| Standard operating procedure (SOP) | Documents were known but not followed | 37 | 84 |
| Documents were not known by user | |||
| Documents were not followed correctly | |||
| Documents were not correct for the task/activity | |||
| Documents were not in place but should have been in place | |||
| Human interaction | Labelling/placement/operation/displays of tools/equipment needed improvement | 14 | 32 |
| Environmental factors within the work area needed improvement | |||
| Workload constraints/pressures/demands needed improvement | |||
| Equipment | Equipment design needed improvement | 11 | 25 |
| Equipment was not properly maintained | |||
| Equipment failed | |||
| Equipment was not fit for purpose | |||
| Quality control was not performed/needed improvement | |||
| Communication | There was no method or system for communication | 10 | 23 |
| Communication did not occur | |||
| Communication was unclear, ambiguous or misunderstood | |||
| Training | Training was not developed or implemented | 8 | 18 |
| Training was inappropriate or insufficient | |||
| Training was available, but not completed | |||
| Staff were not qualified or proficient in performing the task | |||
| Management and oversight | Supervision needed improvement | 7 | 16 |
| Auditing/evaluating/enforcement of standard operating procedure needed improvement | |||
| Auditing/evaluation/enforcement of training needed improvement | |||
| Preparation needed improvement | |||
| Human factors needed improvement | |||
| Risk assessment needed improvement | |||
| Worker selection needed improvement | |||
| Other | 14 | 32 | |
Abbreviations: N, total number; n, number
Notes: More than one root cause can be identified in an incident, percentages rounded to nearest whole number. Data are from the Laboratory Incident Notification Canada (LINC) surveillance system