Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 4;7(4):E568–E575. doi: 10.1055/a-0869-7619

Table 2. Comparison of patient characteristics between the MES 0 and MES 1 groups.

Characteristics (n = 166) MES 0 (n = 91) MES 1 (n = 75) P
Mean age (years)  50.1 ± 15.9  46.7 ± 14.5 NS
Sex (male)  45.1 % (n = 41)  58.7 % (n = 44) NS
Affected area NS
  • Proctitis type (E1)

 15.4 % (n = 14)  14.7 % (n = 11)
  • Left-sided type (E2)

 36.3 % (n = 33)  29.3 % (n = 22)
  • Pancolitis type (E3)

 48.4 % (n = 44)  56.0 % (n = 42)
Histological classification
  • Matts 1,2 (HH)

 91.2 % (n = 83)  52.0 %(n = 39) NS
  • Matts 3,4,5 (NHH)

  8.8 % (n = 8)  48.0 % (n = 36) NS
Mean disease duration (months) 140.4 ± 84.1 158.4 ± 114.8 NS
Smoking rate   2.2 % (n = 2)   4.0 % (n = 3) NS

Values are presented as mean ± standard deviation or % (n). MES, Mayo endoscopic subscore; NS, not significant; HH, histological healing; NHH, non-histological healing.