Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 1;6(2):ENEURO.0400-18.2019. doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0400-18.2019

Table 2.

Statistical tests table

Figure Data structure Type of test Statistical data
1I Normal One-way RM ANOVA Level: F(1.65,6.60) = 1.225, p = 0.34
  distribution (Geisser-Greenhouse correction) Animal: F(4,16) = 5.038, p = 8.04e-3
      Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
      Level 1 vs level 2, q = 1.04, p = 0.94
      Level 1 vs level 3, q = 2.11, p = 0.62
      Level 1 vs level 4, q = 1.80, p = 0.72
      Level 1 vs level 5, q = 1.07, p = 0.93
      Level 2 vs level 3, q = 10.01, p = 9.83e-3
      Level 2 vs level 4, q = 5.23, p = 8.90e-2
      Level 2 vs level 5, q = 0.25, p = 0.99
      Level 3 vs level 4, q = 2.68, p = 0.44
      Level 3 vs level 5, q = 1.57, p = 0.80
      Level 4 vs level 5, q = 1.21, p = 0.90
Figure Data structure Type of test Statistical data
2C Normal Paired t test t = 11.98, df = 8, p = 2.17e-6
Restored group distribution    
Figure Data structure Type of test Statistical data
3A Growth curve Two-way ANOVA Interaction F(18,384) = 8.76, p < 1.00e-15
Males     Time: F(9,384) = 244, p < 1.00e-15
      Genotype: F(2,384) = 198.2, p < 1.00e-15
      Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
      Five weeks:
      Control vs FNΔ2, q = 3.23, p = 5.97e-2
      Control vs restored, q = 0.80, p = 0.84
      FNΔ2 vs restored, q = 2.80, p = 0.12
      Six weeks:
      Control vs FNΔ2, q = 4.34, p = 6.46e-3
      Control vs restored, q = 0.00, p > 0.99
      FNΔ2 vs restored, q = 4.66, p = 3.07e-3
      Seven weeks:
      Control vs FNΔ2, q = 5.46, p = 3.90e-4
      Control vs restored, q = 0.16, p = 0.99
      FNΔ2 vs restored, q = 5.99, p = 8.38e-5
3B Growth curve Two-way ANOVA Interaction F(18,294) = 19.75, p < 1.00e-15
Females     Time: F(9,294) = 158.4, p < 1.00e-15
      Genotype: F(2,294) = 473.2, p < 1.00e-15
      Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
      Four weeks:
      Control vs FNΔ2, q = 1.98, p = 0.34
      Control vs restored, q = 1.13, p = 0.71
      FNΔ2 vs restored, q = 2.99, p = 8.94e-2
      Five weeks:
      Control vs FNΔ2, q = 4.11, p = 1.10e-2
      Control vs restored, q = 1.88, p = 0.38
      FNΔ2 vs restored, q = 5.82, p = 1.48e-4
      Six weeks:
      Control vs FNΔ2, q = 7.80, p = 2.32e-7
      Control vs restored, q = 1.69, p = 0.46
      FNΔ2 vs restored, q = 9.55, p = 2.31e-10
3C Normal One-way ANOVA F(2,23) = 138.4, p < 15.1e-14
Fat mass, males distribution   Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
      Control vs FNΔ2, q = 19.97, p = 2.39e-12
      Control vs restored, q = 0.05, p > 0.99
      FNΔ2 vs restored, q = 21.10, p = 7.78e-13
3C Normal One-way ANOVA F(2,23) = 0.167, p = 0.85
Lean mass, males distribution   Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
      Control vs FNΔ2, q = 0.50, p = 0.93
      Control vs restored, q = 0.29, p = 0.98
      FNΔ2 vs restored, q = 0.81, p = 0.84
3D Normal One-way ANOVA F(2,18) = 138.4, p = 1.18e-11
Fat mass, females distribution   Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
      Control vs FNΔ2, q = 21.01, p = 4.51e-11
      Control vs restored, q = 0.33, p = 0.97
      FNΔ2 vs restored, q = 21.98, p = 2.09e-12
3D Normal One-way ANOVA F(2,18) = 6.16, p = 9.17e-3
Lean mass, females distribution   Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
      Control vs FNΔ2, q = 3.24, p = 0.08
      Control vs restored, q = 1.83, p = 0.42
      FNΔ2 vs restored, q = 4.96, p = 6.74e-3
3E Normal One-way ANOVA F(2,20) = 157.4, p = 5.80e-14
Gonadal fat, males distribution   Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
      Control vs FNΔ2, q = 22.76, p = 2.00e-12
      Control vs restored, q = 0.51, p = 0.93
      FNΔ2 vs restored, q = 23.51, p = 1.09e-12
3E Normal One-way ANOVA F(2,19) = 354.5, p < 1.00e-15
Inguinal fat, males distribution   Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
      Control vs FNΔ2, q = 34.87, p < 1.00e-15
      Control vs restored, q = 0.60, p = 0.91
      FNΔ2 vs restored, q = 34.40, p < 1.00e-15
3F Normal One-way ANOVA F(2,18) = 173.8, p = 1.70e-12
Gonadal fat, females distribution   Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
      Control vs FNΔ2, q = 24.08, p = 4.26e-12
      Control vs restored, q = 0.62, p = 0.90
      FNΔ2 vs restored, q = 25.06, p = 2.12e-12
3F Normal One-way ANOVA F(2,17) = 57.55, p = 2.70e-8
Inguinal fat, females distribution   Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
      Control vs FNΔ2, q = 13.68, p = 7.26e-8
      Control vs restored, q = 0.20, p = 0.99
      FNΔ2 vs restored, q = 14.49, p = 3.12e-8
4F Normal Two-way ANOVA Interaction F(1,36) = 3.207, p = 0.11
  distribution   Genotype: F(1,36) = 3.61e-5, p = 0.99
      Detection: F(1,36) = 45.97, p = 6.39e-8
      Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
      Control-A568 vs restored-A568, q = 1.57, p = 0.69
      Control-A568 vs control-DAB, q = 5.24, p = 3.76e-3
      Control-A568 vs restored-DAB, q = 6.65, p = 2.10e-4
      Restored-A568 vs control-DAB, q = 6.92, p = 1.19e-4
      Restored-A568 vs restored-DAB, q = 8.26, p = 6.60e-6
      Control-DAB vs restored-DAB, q = 1.74, p = 0.61
4F Normal distribution One-way ANOVA F(2,51) = 24.9, p = 2.85e-8Tukey’s multiple comparisons testA568 vs DAB, q = 9.97, p = 1.35e-8A548 vs A488, q = 4.58, p = 5.87e-3DAB vs A488, q = 4.74, p = 4.31e-3
     
5 (data not shown) Normal Student’s t test t = 10.75, df = 13, p = 7.76e-8
# of Pomc neurons distribution    
5E Normal Two-way RM ANOVA Interaction F(1,12) = 20.23, p = 7.30e-4
  distribution   Genotype: F(1,12) = 3.181, p = 9.98e-2
      Marker: F(1,12) = 1.363, p = 0.27
      Sidak’s multiple comparisons test
      Control-Vglut2 + vs restored-Vglut2 +, t = 4.37, p = 4.10e-4
      Control-Gad67 + vs restored-Gad67 +, t = 1.76, p = 0.17
      Control-Vglut2 + vs control-Gad67 +, t = 3.75, p = 5.56e-3
      Restored-Vglut2 + vs restored-Gad67 +, t = 2.54, p = 5.09e-2
5E (data not shown) Normal Student’s t test t = 4.498, df = 12, p = 7.30e-4
Difference distribution    
5F Normal Two-way RM ANOVA Interaction F(1,12) = 23.86, p = 3.76e-4
  distribution   Genotype: F(1,12) = 46.4, p = 1.87e-5
      Marker: F(1,12) = 4.797, p = 4.90e-2
      Sidak’s multiple comparisons test
      Control-Vglut2 + vs restored-Vglut2 +, t = 3.96, p = 1.17e-3
      Control-Gad67 + vs restored-Gad67 +, t = 8.27, p = 3.50e-8
      Control-Vglut2 + vs control-Gad67 +, t = 4.68, p = 1.07e-3
      Restored-Vglut2 + vs restored-Gad67 +, t = 2.06, p = 0.12
5E (data not shown) Normal Student’s t test t = 4.884, df = 12, p = 3.76e-4
Difference distribution    
5G Normal One-way ANOVA F(2,32) = 10.63, p = 2.88e-4
  distribution   Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
      Control vs FNΔ2, q = 5.96, p = 5.43e-4
      Control vs restored, q = 0.65, p = 0.89
      FNΔ2 vs restored, q = 6.34, p = 2.54e-4
6M Normal Two-way RM ANOVA Interaction F(12,60) = 13.10, p = 1.19e-12
  distribution   Neurotransmitter: F(3,15) = 47.14, p = 7.16e-8
      Level: F(4,20) = 3.16, p = 3.63e-2
      Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
      Level 1 vs level 2, q = 3.71, p = 0.10
      Level 1 vs level 3, q = 1.42, p = 0.85
      Level 1 vs level 4, q = 2.70, p = 0.35
      Level 1 vs level 5, q = 0.52, p > 0.99
      Level 2 vs level 3, q = 2.29, p = 0.50
      Level 2 vs level 4, q = 1.01, p = 0.95
      Level 2 vs level 5, q = 4.23, p = 5.02e-2
      Level 3 vs level 4, q = 1.28, p = 0.89
      Level 3 vs level 5, q = 1.94, p = 0.65
      Level 4 vs level 5, q = 3.22, p = 0.19
6N Normal Two-way RM ANOVA Interaction F(12,60) = 13.10, p = 1.19e-12
  distribution   Neurotransmitter: F(3,15) = 47.14, p = 7.16e-8
      Level: F(4,20) = 3.16, p = 3.63e-2
      Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
      Vglut2 + vs Gad67 +, q = 6.87, p = 1.07e-3
      Vglut2 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 8.29, p = 1.66e-4
      Vglut2 + vs Pomc-only, q = 6.62, p = 1.51e-3
      Gad67 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 1.42, p = 0.75
      Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 13.49, p = 5.09e-7
      Vglut2/Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 14.90, p = 1.37e-7
6O Normal Two-way RM ANOVA Interaction F(12,60) = 13.10, p = 1.19e-12
  distribution   Neurotransmitter: F(3,15) = 47.14, p = 7.16e-8
      Level: F(4,20) = 3.16, p = 3.63e-2
      Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
      Vglut2 +:
      Level 1 vs level 2, q = 0.23, p = 0.99
      Level 1 vs level 3, q = 4.54, p = 1.75e-2
      Level 1 vs level 4, q = 3.39, p = 0.13
      Level 1 vs level 5, q = 7.18, p = 3.80e-5
      Level 2 vs level 3, q = 4.31, p = 2.71e-2
      Level 2 vs level 4, q = 3.16, p = 0.18
      Level 2 vs level 5, q = 6.96, p = 6.80e-5
      Level 3 vs level 4, q = 1.15, p = 0.93
      Level 3 vs level 5, q = 2.64, p = 0.35
      Level 4 vs level 5, q = 3.79, p = 6.85e-2
      Gad67 +:
      Level 1 vs level 2, q = 7.05, p = 5.33e-5
      Level 1 vs level 3, q = 4.90, p = 8.36e-3
      Level 1 vs level 4, q = 1.50, p = 0.83
      Level 1 vs level 5, q = 7.18, p = 0.41
      Level 2 vs level 3, q = 2.15, p = 0.55
      Level 2 vs level 4, q = 5.55, p = 2.03e-3
      Level 2 vs level 5, q = 9.53, p = 6.85e-8
      Level 3 vs level 4, q = 3.40, p = 0.13
      Level 3 vs level 5, q = 7.38, p = 2.26e-5
      Level 4 vs level 5, q = 3.98, p = 4.98e-2
      Pomc-only:
      Level 1 vs level 2, q = 1.10, p = 0.94
      Level 1 vs level 3, q = 1.59, p = 0.79
      Level 1 vs level 4, q = 1.56, p = 0.80
      Level 1 vs level 5, q = 2.77, p = 0.30
      Level 2 vs level 3, q = 0.49, p = 0.99
      Level 2 vs level 4, q = 0.46, p = 0.99
      Level 2 vs level 5, q = 1.67, p = 0.76
      Level 3 vs level 4, q = 0.03, p = 0.99
      Level 3 vs level 5, q = 1.18, p = 0.92
      Level 4 vs level 5, q = 1.21, p = 0.91
      Vglut2/Gad67 +:
      Level 1 vs level 2, q = 6.44, p = 2.51e-4
      Level 1 vs level 3, q = 5.88, p = 9.63e-4
      Level 1 vs level 4, q = 12.31, p = 5.13e-11
      Level 1 vs level 5, q = 10.71, p = 2.63e-9
      Level 2 vs level 3, q = 0.56, p = 0.99
      Level 2 vs level 4, q = 5.87, p = 9.77e-4
      Level 2 vs level 5, q = 4.27, p = 2.92e-2
      Level 3 vs level 4, q = 6.43, p = 5.54e-4
      Level 3 vs level 5, q = 4.83, p = 9.68e-3
      Level 4 vs level 5, q = 1.60, p = 0.79
      Level 1:
      Vglut2 + vs Gad67 +, q = 1.14, p = 0.85
      Vglut2 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 5.16, p = 3.00e-3
      Vglut2 + vs Pomc-only, q = 5.63, p = 1.05e-3
      Gad67 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 4.02, p = 3.02e-2
      Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 4.49, p = 1.23e-2
      Vglut2/Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 0.47, p = 0.99
      Level 2:
      Vglut2 + vs Gad67 +, q = 6.14, p = 3.18e-4
      Vglut2 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 1.50, p = 0.72
      Vglut2 + vs Pomc-only, q = 6.51, p = 1.29e-4
      Gad67 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 4.64, p = 9.16e-3
      Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 12.64, p = 2.74e-11
      Vglut2/Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 8.00, p = 2.67e-6
      Level 3:
      Vglut2 + vs Gad67 +, q = 8.30, p = 1.20e-6
      Vglut2 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 5.25, p = 2.48e-3
      Vglut2 + vs Pomc-only, q = 2.68, p = 0.24
      Gad67 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 3.05, p = 0.15
      Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 10.99, p = 7.50e-10
      Vglut2/Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 7.94, p = 3.19e-6
      Level 4:
      Vglut2 + vs Gad67 +, q = 3.75, p = 4.92e-2
      Vglut2 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 10.53, p = 2.60e-9
      Vglut2 + vs Pomc-only, q = 3.80, p = 4.45e-2
      Gad67 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 6.78, p = 6.41e-5
      Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 7.55, p = 8.88e-6
      Vglut2/Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 14.33, p = 2.00e-11
      Level 5:
      Vglut2 + vs Gad67 +, q = 3.56, p = 6.73e-2
      Vglut2 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 12.73, p = 2.58e-11
      Vglut2 + vs Pomc-only, q = 1.22, p = 0.83
      Gad67 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 9.17, p = 1.13e-7
      Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 4.78, p = 6.89e-3
      Vglut2/Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 13.94, p = 2.01e-11
6P Normal Two-way RM ANOVA Interaction F(12,60) = 11.47, p = 1.69e-11
  distribution   Neurotransmitter: F(3,15) = 2.105, p = 0.14
      Level: F(4,20) = 3.205, p = 3.46e-2
      Tukey’s multiple comparisons test
      Vglut2 +:
      Level 1 vs level 2, q = 0.45, p = 0.99
      Level 1 vs level 3, q = 5.48, p = 2.42e-3
      Level 1 vs level 4, q = 3.95, p = 5.22e-2
      Level 1 vs level 5, q = 8.61, p = 8.65e-7
      Level 2 vs level 3, q = 5.02, p = 6.49e-3
      Level 2 vs level 4, q = 3.50, p = 0.11
      Level 2 vs level 5, q = 8.16, p = 2.92e-6
      Level 3 vs level 4, q = 1.52, p = 0.82
      Level 3 vs level 5, q = 3.13, p = 0.19
      Level 4 vs level 5, q = 4.65, p = 1.39e-2
      Gad67 +:
      Level 1 vs level 2, q = 5.36, p = 3.13e-3
      Level 1 vs level 3, q = 3.76, p = 7.27e-2
      Level 1 vs level 4, q = 1.37, p = 0.87
      Level 1 vs level 5, q = 1.54, p = 0.81
      Level 2 vs level 3, q = 1.60, p = 0.79
      Level 2 vs level 4, q = 4.00, p = 4.85e-2
      Level 2 vs level 5, q = 6.90, p = 7.79e-5
      Level 3 vs level 4, q = 2.39, p = 0.45
      Level 3 vs level 5, q = 5.30, p = 3.56e-3
      Level 4 vs level 5, q = 2.91, p = 0.25
      Pomc-only:
      Level 1 vs level 2, q = 4.81, p = 1.02e-2
      Level 1 vs level 3, q = 6.05, p = 6.39e-4
      Level 1 vs level 4, q = 6.88, p = 8.36e-5
      Level 1 vs level 5, q = 11.14, p = 8.14e-9
      Level 2 vs level 3, q = 1.24, p = 0.90
      Level 2 vs level 4, q = 2.07, p = 0.59
      Level 2 vs level 5, q = 6.33, p = 3.27e-4
      Level 3 vs level 4, q = 0.83, p = 0.98
      Level 3 vs level 5, q = 5.09, p = 5.66e-3
      Level 4 vs level 5, q = 4.26, p = 2.98e-2
      Vglut2/Gad67 +:
      Level 1 vs level 2, q = 4.02, p = 4.68e-2
      Level 1 vs level 3, q = 3.69, p = 8.14e-2
      Level 1 vs level 4, q = 7.75, p = 8.64e-6
      Level 1 vs level 5, q = 7.01, p = 6.00e-5
      Level 2 vs level 3, q = 0.32, p = 0.99
      Level 2 vs level 4, q = 3.74, p = 7.55e-2
      Level 2 vs level 5, q = 2.99, p = 0.23
      Level 3 vs level 4, q = 4.06, p = 4.31e-2
      Level 3 vs level 5, q = 3.32, p = 0.15
      Level 4 vs level 5, q = 0.75, p = 0.98
      Level 1:
      Vglut2 + vs Gad67 +, q = 5.49, p = 1.47e-3
      Vglut2 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 8.19, p = 1.62e-6
      Vglut2 + vs Pomc-only, q = 2.08, p = 0.46
      Gad67 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 2.70, p = 0.23
      Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 7.56, p = 8.58e-6
      Vglut2/Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 10.27, p = 5.40e-8
      Level 2:
      Vglut2 + vs Gad67 +, q = 0.33, p = 0.99
      Vglut2 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 3.72, p = 5.11e-2
      Vglut2 + vs Pomc-only, q = 2.28, p = 0.38
      Gad67 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 4.05, p = 2.87e-2
      Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 2.61, p = 0.26
      Vglut2/Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 1.44, p = 0.74
      Level 3:
      Vglut2 + vs Gad67 +, q = 3.75, p = 4.90e-2
      Vglut2 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 0.98, p = 0.90
      Vglut2 + vs Pomc-only, q = 1.50, p = 0.71
      Gad67 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 2.77, p = 0.21
      Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 2.25, p = 0.39
      Vglut2/Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 0.53, p = 0.98
      Level 4:
      Vglut2 + vs Gad67 +, q = 0.17, p = 0.99
      Vglut2 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 3.51, p = 7.26e-2
      Vglut2 + vs Pomc-only, q = 0.85, p = 0.98
      Gad67 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 3.68, p = 5.50e-2
      Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 0.68, p = 0.96
      Vglut2/Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 4.36, p = 1.60e-2
      Level 5:
      Vglut2 + vs Gad67 +, q = 1.58, p = 0.68
      Vglut2 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 7.42, p = 1.24e-5
      Vglut2 + vs Pomc-only, q = 0.45, p = 0.99
      Gad67 + vs Vglut2/Gad67 +, q = 5.85, p = 6.39e-4
      Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 2.03, p = 0.48
      Vglut2/Gad67 + vs Pomc-only, q = 7.88, p = 3.74e-6
6P Normal Linear regression Slopes: F(3,11) = 20.84, p = 7.66e-5
  distribution   Vglut2 +:
      F(1,28) = 33.87, p = 2.97e-6, R 2 = 0.83
      Gad67 + (levels 2–5):
      F(1,22) = 57.49, p = 1.42e-7, R 2 = 0.98
      Pomc-only:
      F(1,28) = 23.72, p = 3.95e-5, R 2 = 0.92
      Vglut2/Gad67 +:
      F(1,28) = 39.83, p = 7.95e-7, R 2 = 0.83