Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018 Oct 14;49(5):1456–1466. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26312

Table 3.

Histopathological factors (and summary values) assessed as covariates of liver R2* value

Covariate 1.5T (n=89) 3T (n=119) p-values (1.5T vs 3T) FLINT (Adults, n=101) CyNCh (Children, n=107) p-values (FLINT vs CyNCH)
Steatosis grade* 0.53 <0.001
 Grade 0 1% (1/89) 0% (0/119) 1% (1/101) 0% (0/107)
 Grade 1 27% (24/89) 23% (27/119) 33% (33/101) 17% (18/107)
 Grade 2 30% (27/89) 37% (44/119) 40% (40/101) 29% (31/107)
 Grade 3 42% (37/89) 40% (48/119) 27% (27/101) 54% (58/107)
Steatosis location 0.20 <0.001
 Zone 3 (acinar) 39% (35/89) 43% (51/119) 43% (43/101) 40% (43/107)
 Zone 1 (periportal) 13% (12/89) 5% (6/119) 0% (0/101) 17% (18/107)
 Azonal 18% (16/89) 19% (23/119) 32% (32/101) 7% (7/107)
 Panacinar 29% (26/89) 33% (39/119) 26% (26/101) 36% (39/107)
Hepatocyte ballooning score 0.74 <0.001
 Score 0 33% (29/89) 38% (45/119) 15% (15/101) 55% (59/107)
 Score 1 34% (30/89) 31% (37/89) 35% (35/101) 30% (32/107)
 Score 2 34% (30/89) 31% (37/89) 50% (51/101) 15% (16/107)
Lobular inflammation score 0.070 0.35
 Score 1 43% (38/89) 31% (37/119) 33% (33/101) 39% (42/107)
 Score 2 39% (35/89) 55% (66/119) 49% (49/101) 49% (52/107)
 Score 3 18% (16/89) 13% (16/119) 19% (19/101) 12% (13/107)
Portal inflammation score 0.51 0.66
 Score 0 4% (4/89) 8% (10/119) 7% (7/101) 7% (7/107)
 Score 1 73% (65/89) 68% (81/119) 67% (68/101) 73% (78/107)
 Score 2 22% (20/89) 24% (28/119) 26% (26/101) 21% (22/107)
NAFLD activity score 4.9 ± 1.4 4.9 ± 1.4 0.75 5.1 ± 1.4 4.7 ± 1.4 <0.05
Fibrosis stage* 0.99 <0.001
 Stage 0 20% (18/89) 22% (26/119) 16% (16/101) 26% (28/107)
 Stage 1 34% (30/89) 34% (40/119) 24% (24/101) 43% (46/107)
 Stage 2 19% (17/89) 19% (23/119) 26% (26/101) 13% (14/107)
 Stage 3 26% (23/89) 24% (28/119) 33% (33/101) 17% (18/107)
 Stage 4 1% (1/89) 2% (2/119) 2% (2/101) 1% (1/107)
Lipid droplet size* 0.99 <0.01
 Predominantly large droplet 70% (62/89) 69% (82/119) 78% (79/101) 61% (65/107)
 Mixed large and small droplet 28% (25/89) 26% (31/119) 17% (17/101) 36% (39/107)
 Predominantly small droplet 2% (2/89) 5% (6/119) 5% (5/101) 3% (3/107)
Glycogenosis 0.54 0.92
 Not present 55% (49/89) 49% (58/119) 52% (53/101) 50% (54/107)
 Focal, involving <50% of hepatocytes 24% (21/89) 24% (28/119) 24% (24/101) 23% (25/107)
 Diffuse, involving >= 50% of hepatocytes 21% (19/89) 28% (33/119) 24% (24/101) 26% (28/107)
Hepatocellular iron grade* 0.45 <0.001
 Grade 0 85% (75/88) 80% (93/116) 70% (68/97) 93% (100/107)
 Grade 1 12% (10/88) 17% (20/116) 24% (23/97) 7% (7/107)
 Grade 2 3% (3/88) 3% (3/116) 6% (6/97) 0% (0/107)
Non-hepatocellular iron grade* 0.41 <0.001
 Grade 0 86% (76/88) 81% (94/116) 69% (67/97) 96% (103/107)
 Grade 1 11% (10/88) 13% (15/116) 22% (21/97) 4% (4/107)
 Grade 2 2% (2/88) 6% (7/116) 9% (9/97) 0% (0/107)

For NAFLD activity score, data are presented as mean +/− standard deviation, and p-values are for the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test. For the remaining nominal and ordinal variables, data are presented as proportion (counts/total) and p-values are for the Chi-Square test.

*

For the Chi-Square test, some categories were combined due to the small number of samples in each individual category, to increase statistical robustness. These included: steatosis grade (grades 0 and 1); fibrosis stage (stages 3 and 4); lipid droplet size (mixed and predominantly small); hepatocellular iron grade (grades 1 and 2); and non-hepatocellular iron grade (grades 1 and 2).