Table 5.
Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Factors | HR | 95% CI | P | HR | 95% CI | P |
Gender (female/male) | 1.002 | 0.702–1.430 | 0.991 | |||
Age (< 65/≥ 65) | 1.027 | 0.697–1.514 | 0.892 | |||
Smoking (never/ever) | 0.872 | 0.580–1.310 | 0.509 | |||
ECOG (0–1/2–3) | 0.604 | 0.374–0.977 | 0.040 | 0.598 | 0.364–0.980 | 0.042 |
Histology (adenocarcinoma/non‐adenocarcinoma) | 0.962 | 0.568–1.629 | 0.884 | |||
EGFR mutation | 0.278 | |||||
19del/double mutation | 1.273 | 0.460–3.523 | 0.642 | |||
L858R/double mutation | 1.655 | 0.597–4.591 | 0.333 | |||
Other/double mutation | 2.827 | 0.624–12.813 | 0.178 | |||
EGFR‐TKIs | 0.097 | 0.029 | ||||
Gefitinib/2‐TKIs | 7.595 | 1.045–55.222 | 0.045 | 6.179 | 0.833–45.820 | 0.075 |
Erlotinib/2‐TKIs | 6.225 | 0.849–45.635 | 0.072 | 4.024 | 0.538–30.118 | 0.175 |
Icotinib/2‐TKIs | 4.221 | 0.566–36.114 | 0.155 | 2.882 | 0.345–24.111 | 0.329 |
Treatment line of EGFR‐TKIs (1/≥ 2) | 1.185 | 0.824–1.704 | 0.359 | |||
Efficacy of EGFR‐TKIs | 0.005 | 0.002 | ||||
PR/PD | 0.334 | 0.170–0.658 | 0.002 | 0.276 | 0.134–0.569 | 0.000 |
SD/PD | 0.454 | 0.231–0.894 | 0.022 | 0.319 | 0.153–0.664 | 0.002 |
If re‐biopsied | <0.001 | 0.000 | ||||
Re‐biopsy/no re‐biopsy | 0.466 | 0.300–0.725 | 0.001 | 0.358 | 0.220–0.582 | 0.000 |
Liquid biopsy/no re‐biopsy | 0.276 | 0.146–0.520 | <0.001 | 0.279 | 0.145–0.535 | 0.000 |
TBR | 0.450 | |||||
T790M+ 3‐TKI+/T790M‐3‐TKI‐ | 0.707 | 0.407–1.229 | 0.219 | |||
T790M+ 3‐TKI‐/T790M‐3‐TKI‐ | 0.769 | 0.483–1.225 | 0.269 | |||
T790M‐ 3‐TKI+/T790M‐3‐TKI‐ | 0.673 | 0.246–1.842 | 0.441 |
Variables of P < 0.1 in univariate analysis were included into multivariate analysis. Treatment‐based result (TBR): patients were divided into four groups according to whether T790M was positive and third‐generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (3‐TKIs) were used. 2‐TKIs, second‐generation TKIs; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; OS, overall survival; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease.