Table 7.
Correlations r between the overall rating measures and the models.
| Model | Raters—Exp. 1 (n = 16) (# of notes = 239) | Raters—Exp. 2 (n = 5) (# of notes = 638) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall rating | Overall rating | |||
| r | m | r | m | |
| M | 0.54 | 1 | ||
| C | 0.61 | 8 | 0.43 | 2 |
| H1 | 0.57 | 2 | 0.62 | 1 |
| H2 | 0.57 | 1, 2 | 0.61 | 1 |
| MC | 0.59 | 4 | 0.54 | 2 |
| CH1 | 0.56 | 3 | 0.61 | 2 |
| CH2 | 0.57 | 3 | 0.59 | 2 |
| MCH1 | 0.57 | 2, 3 | 0.62 | 3 |
| MCH2 | 0.58 | 2, 3 | 0.62 | 2 |
M, metrical accents; C, melodic contour accents; H, harmonic accents; MC, metrical-melodic accents; CH, melodic-harmonic accents; MCH, metrical-melodic-harmonic accents; n, number of participants. A note position is counted as an accent only if there are at least m raters who marked that note. All correlations are significant at p < 0.001.