Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 4;85(8):e01547-18. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01547-18

TABLE 4.

Names, numbers of individual replicates included in the microbiota analyses in the three treatments (AUT, NET and SED), and origin information of the 12 Daphnia magna clones used in this study

Source and clone ID Na
Country Latitude Longitude
AUT NET SED
D. magna diversity panelb
    BE-OHZ-T10 4 5 3 Belgium 50°50′00″N 4°39′00″E
    CZ-N1-1 8 8 8 Czech Rep. 48°46′31.14″N 16°43′24.70″E
    CZ-N2-6 6 7 6 Czech Rep. 48°46′31.14″N 16°43′24.70″E
    DE-K35-Mu10 4 3 4 Germany 48°12′23.93″N 11°42′34.98″E
    DE-KA-F28 8 7 7 Germany 50°56′02″N 6°55′41″E
    ES-DO1-1 7 6 7 Spain 36°58′42.1″N 6°28′39.5″W
    TR-EG-1 5 7 8 Turkey 39°49′25″N 32°49′50″E
    BE-WE-G59 7 8 7 Belgium 51°04′04″N 3°46′25″E
    No-V-7 4 3 2 Norway 67°41′13.06″N 12°40′19.09″E
D. magna QTL panelc
    IXF1 (F1 clone) 5 8 7
    F2-82 (F2 clone) 7 7 4
    F2-918 (F2 clone) 5 6 6
a

AUT, exposure to autoclaved sediment; NET, prevented exposure to untreated sediment; SED, exposure to untreated sediments.

b

A geographically diverse collection of clones maintained asexually in the laboratory since 2012.

c

An intercross F2 recombinant panel maintained asexually in the laboratory since 2006/2007.