Table 2.

Results of the Kruskal-Wallis Tests and the Wilcoxon Rank–Sum Tests comparing differences between the conditions

		Highly trained vs Minimally trained		Highly trained vs No training		Minimally trained vs No training		Overall			Pooled FCU vs No training
		Z	p	Z	p	Z	p	χ2	DF	p	Z	p
Complete Sessions	COACH composite score	−1.77	.077	−2.20	.028	0.89	.373	5.96	2	.051	−1.81	.070
	Conceptually accurate	−0.92	.355	−4.39	<.001	3.67	<.001	22.50	2	<.001	−4.66	<.001
	Observant and responsive	−1.69	.091	−0.83	.406	−0.87	.385	2.95	2	.229	−0.01	.995
	Actively structures	−2.07	.039	−1.50	.132	−0.08	.937	4.46	2	.108	−0.85	.397
	Corrective feedback	−1.62	.105	−1.81	.070	0.50	.614	4.22	2	.122	−1.37	.170
	Hope and motivation	−1.61	.106	−1.83	.067	0.71	.477	4.38	2	.111	−1.50	.135
	Caregiver Engagement	−3.22	.001	−3.09	.002	0.16	.874	13.47	2	.001	−1.92	.055
20-minute Segments	COACH composite score	−1.08	.278	−2.64	.008	−1.99	.047	8.07	2	.018	−2.67	.008
	Conceptually accurate	−0.35	.725	−4.54	<.0001	−3.63	<.001	22.44	2	<.001	−4.70	<.001
	Observant and responsive	−1.26	.206	−1.59	.112	−0.55	.584	3.06	2	.217	−1.24	.213
	Actively structures	−2.13	.034	−2.45	.014	−1.02	.308	7.75	2	.021	−2.00	.045
	Corrective feedback	−0.53	.597	−2.33	.020	−1.77	.077	5.90	2	.052	−2.36	.018
	Hope and motivation	−0.39	.693	−1.36	.174	−1.02	.307	2.05	2	.358	−1.37	.170
	Caregiver Engagement	1.02	.309	–1.60	.109	–2.05	.040	5.19	2	.075	–2.10	.035

Note.

^*p-value significant after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons, < .00125.