Table 4.
Highly trained/routine and universal monitoring | Minimally trained/optional and variable monitoring | No training | Overall | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S | p | S | p | S | p | S | p | |
COACH composite score | −48.5 | .143 | −2.5 | .937 | −25.5 | .353 | −252.5 | .099 |
Conceptually accurate | −35.5 | .065 | −0.5 | 1.000 | −3.0 | .842 | −110.0 | .180 |
Observant and responsive | −16.5 | .639 | 7.5 | .796 | −15.0 | .534 | −73.0 | .595 |
Actively structures | −16.0 | .609 | 3.0 | .893 | −24.0 | .309 | −100.5 | .381 |
Corrective feedback | −41.5 | .142 | 11.0 | .654 | −32.0 | .195 | −181.0 | .152 |
Hope and motivation | −52.0 | .052 | −16.5 | .365 | −21.5 | .223 | −248.5 | .013* |
Caregiver Engagement | −82.0 | .004* | 22.5 | .232 | −18.5 | .159 | −228.5 | .023 |
Note.
p-value significant after Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons, < .018.