Skip to main content
. 2016 May 8;2016(5):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub2

Mager 2002.

Methods Single centre RCT evaluating the distribution of talc during a talc slurry pleurodesis ‐ comparing rotation with non‐rotation of participants after instillation of talc slurry (Netherlands)
Participants Inclusion: symptomatic MPE confirmed by cytology or histology (all cell types)
Exclusion: haemorrhagic disease; trapped lung; previous pleurodesis on ipsilateral side; other disease which would interfere with the study; participants on systemic treatment or expected to be within four weeks of pleurodesis; expected survival < 1month
20 participants randomised
Interventions Chest drain inserted and pleurodesis performed when drainage < 150 ml/24 hours and lung fully re‐expanded. Talc suspension was radiolabeled. Dynamic scintigraphy performed during, immediately after and one hour after instillation
Rotation arm: sequence of four positions changing every 10 mins after instillation of talc for one hour
Non‐rotation arm: strict bed rest in supine position after instillation
Tube removed when < 100 ml/24hour fluid drained
Outcomes Distribution of talc in the thoracic cavity, measured on scintigram immediately after instillation of talc and after one hour
Success rate of pleurodesis (defined on CXR) at four weeks
Notes People with trapped lung excluded
Not included in network meta‐analysis
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Sealed envelopes (10 allocating participant to rotation and 10 to non‐rotation)
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sealed envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Unable to blind due to the nature of the interventions
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated if CXR reporting was performed by a blinded individual
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Small numbers but no LTFU. Minimal data on baseline participant characteristics
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk No serious side effects. Some discomfort in rotation group (not quantified). All study participants alive at one months' follow up. (Personal communication)
Other bias Low risk CXR only used to define pleurodesis. Small numbers in the study