Skip to main content
. 2016 May 8;2016(5):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub2

Millar 1980.

Methods RCT of intrapleural Corynebacterium parvum vs mustine in recurrent MPE (UK)
Participants Recurrent effusion associated with histologically proved malignant disease (all cell types); at least two previous pleural aspirations; symptoms of dyspnoea, cough or local pain
21 participants randomised
Interventions Effusion completely aspirated using an Abrams pleural biopsy needle
Group A: intrapleural mustine 20 mg (max 2 doses)
Group B: intrapleural C. parvum 7 mg (max 2 doses)
Outcomes Response to pleurodesis (defined by fluid re‐accumulation on CXR and need for repeat aspiration ‐ success/partial success/failure) at four weeks
Symptoms (nausea, vomiting, pain)
Notes Trapped lung not accounted for
Only 'success' counted as a pleurodesis success for analysis (not partial successes as these participants required a further aspiration of effusion)
Included in network meta‐analysis for pleurodesis efficacy and mortality
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No mention of blinding in the paper
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk No mention of blinding in the paper. If unblinded, symptom and side effect reporting could have been biased
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Three participants excluded from analysis as died before primary outcome measure
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All stated outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk Unclear who provided C. parvum and their study involvement