Skip to main content
. 2016 May 8;2016(5):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub2

Mohsen 2011.

Methods Single Centre RCT of thoracoscopic talc poudrage versus povidone‐iodine pleurodesis through an intercostal drain (Egypt)
Participants Inclusion: MPE as a complication of breast carcinoma
Exclusion: performance status > 3; allergy to iodine; trapped lung; no change in MRC dyspnoea scale after thoracentesis; pleural fluid pH < 7.2; pleural fluid glucose < 60 mg/dl; extrathoracic metastasis
42 participants randomised
Interventions All participants underwent a VATS drainage and adhesiolysis
Talc poudrage group: 4 g talc insufflation under thoracoscopic guidance at the end of the VATS procedure
Iodine group: recovered from VATS. Then later that day, 20 ml 10% povidone‐iodine in 30 ml saline injected through the chest drain at the bedside. Drain clamped for four hours after instillation
Outcomes Efficacy of pleurodesis at two months (response defined as 'complete response' (CR) (absence of fluid re‐accumulation), 'partial response' (PR) (residual pleural fluid or re‐accumulation, which did not require further thoracocentesis or remained asymptomatic) or 'failure' (additional pleural procedures were necessary)
Complications
Length of hospital stay (in days)
Survival
Change in MRC dyspnoea score
Notes People with trapped lung excluded from trial entry
CR + PR counted as pleurodesis success for analysis
Included in network meta‐analysis for pleurodesis efficacy, mortality and fever
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Computer randomisation software used
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Computer randomisation software used
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not able to blind given the nature of the interventions
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Symptom and side effect reporting would be effected by lack of blinding. Not stated if radiology was interpreted blindly. Mortality would not be biased by lack of blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Minimal missing data (primary outcome data available for all patients at two months)
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All stated outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk No other biases identified