Skip to main content
. 2016 May 8;2016(5):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub2

Ostrowski 1989.

Methods Multi‐centre RCT bleomycin vs Corynebacterium parvum in MPE (UK)
Participants Inclusion criteria: histocytologically proven malignancy with effusion (all cell types); life expectancy of > 30 days
Exclusion criteria: previous intrapleural drug administration; change in cancer treatment in previous 30 days
58 participants randomised
Interventions Aspiration of effusion with a cannula. Study drug instilled through the cannula. After cannula removed, participantrepositioned every five minutes
Bleomycin group: 60 mg bleomycin in 100 ml saline. Single dose intrapleurally
C. parvum group: 7 mg in 20 ml saline. Single dose intrapleurally
Outcomes Efficacy of pleurodesis agent at 30 days (defined as 'complete response' (CR) (no re‐accumulation of fluid confirmed by CXR), 'partial response' (PR) (minimal fluid re‐accumulation not sufficient to produce symptoms &/or need for a further aspiration) or 'failure')
Duration of treatment response
Toxicity
Efficacy of pleurodesis at 2, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months
Notes People with trapped lung included in the study
For this review, CR and PR counted as pleurodesis success
Included in network meta‐analysis for pleurodesis efficacy, mortality, fever and pain
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Sequentially labelled sealed envelopes
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Sequentially labelled sealed envelopes
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Not stated explicitly, but agents given as different volumes
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes High risk Symptom recurrence and side effect reporting would be influenced by lack of blinding. Not stated if CXR assessment was blinded. Mortality data would not be biased by lack of blinding
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes High risk 14/58 (24%) excluded from primary analysis due to death or not receiving drug. But, balanced numbers between the groups
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All stated outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk No other biases identified