Skip to main content
. 2016 May 8;2016(5):CD010529. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010529.pub2

Rafiei 2014.

Methods Single centre RCT comparing the pleurodesis success of doxycycline and bleomycin in MPE (Iran)
Participants Inclusion: symptomatic, cytologically proven MPE
Exclusion: allergy to doxycycline or bleomycin; past history of sclerotherapy; systemic chemotherapy immediately prior to or in the next two months after sclerotherapy
42 participants randomised
Interventions All participants underwent 'fluid evacuation'. Agent then instilled through the tube, which was clamped for one hour. Then suction applied and drain removed when < 100 ml/24 hr drainage
Bleomycin group: 45 mg bleomycin intrapleurally
Doxycyclline group: 600 mg doxycycline in 50 ml saline and 10 ml 1% lignocaine intrapleurally
Outcomes CXR appearances of the effusion size at two months (mild, moderate or severe)
Need for repeat pleural fluid drainage
Dyspnoea (mild, moderate or severe)
Complications
Notes People with trapped lung not excluded
Pleurodesis success primarily defined radiologically, but data presented at three months for need for repeat pleural intervention
For this review, need for repeat pleural drainage was used as measure of pleurodesis success
Included in network meta‐analysis for pleurodesis efficacy, fever and pain
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated and no response from study authors to clarify
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not stated and no response from study authors to clarify
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated if anyone was blinded. No response from study authors
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Not stated if anyone was blinded. No response from study authors
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk No loss to follow up
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All stated outcomes reported
Other bias Low risk No other biases identified