Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 29;10:539. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00539

Table 1.

Outcome-elaborated condition.

Expert A1 Expert A2 Expert B1 Expert B2
A1 Genuine Genuine B1 Genuine Genuine
A2 Not genuine Not genuine B2 Not genuine Not genuine
A3 Genuine Genuine B3 Undetermined Undetermined
A4 Not genuine Not genuine B4 Not genuine Not genuine
A5 Genuine Genuine B5 Genuine Genuine
A6 Genuine Genuine B6 Genuine Genuine
A7 Genuine Genuine B7 Genuine Genuine
A8 Not genuine Not genuine B8 Not genuine Not genuine
A9 Genuine Genuine B9 Genuine Genuine
A10 Not genuine Not genuine B10 Not genuine Not genuine
A11 Genuine Genuine B11 Undetermined Undetermined
A12 Not genuine Not genuine B12 Undetermined Undetermined
A13 Not genuine Not genuine B13 Not genuine Not genuine
A14 Not genuine Not genuine B14 Not genuine Not genuine
A15 Genuine Genuine B15 Genuine Genuine
A16 Genuine Genuine B16 Genuine Genuine
A17 Not genuine Not genuine B17 Not genuine Not genuine
A18 Genuine Genuine B18 Genuine Genuine
A19 Not genuine Not genuine B19 Undetermined Undetermined
A20 Not genuine Not genuine B20 Not genuine Not genuine

Left: the assessments of two experts given Bequest A in the risky-outcome version of the art curator scenario; right: the opinions of two different experts given Bequest B in the ambiguous-outcome version.