Table 3.
Log-Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, Multivariable Linear Regression Model Beta-Coefficient (95% CI), n=3,409 | |||
Unadjusted | Model 1 | Model 2 | |
Participants without diabetes♦ (n=3409) | −0.07 (−0.12, −0.031), p=0.001 | 0.03 (−0.01, 0.07), p=0.108 | 0.02 (−0.02, 0.06), p=0.370 |
Participants with normoglycemia (n=1883) | −0.11 (−0.16, −0.06), p<0.001 | 0.00 (−0.05, 0.06), p=0.880 | −0.01 (−0.06, 0.04), p=0.705 |
Participants with prediabetes (n=1526) | −0.07 (−0.13, −0.01), p=0.027 | 0.06 (−0.00, 0.11), p=0.06 | 0.04 (−0.01, 0.10), p=0.138 |
Log-Homeostatic model assessment of β-cell Function, Multivariable Linear Regression Model Beta-Coefficient (95% CI), n=3,409 | |||
Unadjusted | Model 1 | Model 2 | |
Participants without diabetes (n=3409) | −0.24 (−0.28, −0,20), p<0.001 | −0.11 (−0.14, −0.07), p<0.001 | −0.10 (−0.14, −0.06), p<0.001 |
Participants with normoglycemia (n=1883) | −0.21 (−0.26, −0.15), p<0.001 | −0.09 (−0.14, −0.04), p=0.001 | −0.08 (−0.14, −0.03), p<0.001 |
Participants with prediabetes (n=1526) | −0.27 (−0.33, −0.21), p<0.001 | −0.12 (−0.18, −0.07), p<0.001 | −0.12 (−0.17, −0.06), p<0.001 |
Includes subjects with prediabetes and normoglycemia
Model 1 – Adjusted for age, sex, education, occupation, systolic blood pressure, waist circumference, current smoking, physical activity, hormone replacement therapy, beta-blocker medications Model 2 – Model 1 + time of cortisol collection
Log-Homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) Interpretation: A 100% increase in cortisol is associated with a beta-coefficient 100% change in HOMA-IR (%). In the continuous unadjusted model, a 1% increase in serum cortisol is associated with a 7% lower HOMA-IR.
Log-Homeostatic model assessment of β-cell Function (HOMA-β) Interpretation: A 100% increase in cortisol is associated with a beta-coefficient 100% increase in HOMA-β. In the continuous unadjusted model, a 100% increase in serum cortisol is associated with a 24% lower HOMA-β.