Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 27;176(8):1090–1105. doi: 10.1111/bph.14577

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Hesperetin (HSP) decreases cell Na+ load. (a,b) Effects of hesperetin (100 μmol·L−1) on the inactivation time course of I Na in the wild‐type (WT) and R1623Q channels. Current traces were normalized to peak amplitude in order to get a better comparison of the effects on I Na inactivation. For the sake of clarity, only the first 20 ms of the current traces is shown. The dotted lines represent the fit of the inactivation phase of the current with a double‐exponential function with fast and slow components. (c,d) Effects of different concentrations of hesperetin on inactivation time constants of I Na. *P < 0.05 compared with its own control and with WT, n = 12, two‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. (e) Concentration‐dependent effects of hesperetin on the relative amplitude of the slow component of I Na in the WT and R1623Q channels. Hesperetin significantly decreased the relative amplitude of the slow inactivation component. *P < 0.05 with respect to its own control, n = 12, one‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test. (f) hesperetin (100 μmol·L−1) reduced the amount of transported Na+, during the flow of I Na, in R1623Q to the same level as in WT under control condition. Current traces were integrated, and data were expressed as charge normalized to membrane capacitance (pC·pF−1). *P < 0.05 with respect to its own control; § P < 0.05 with respect to WT, n = 32, two‐way ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test