Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 27;40(4):685–693. doi: 10.1007/s00246-019-02092-5

Table 2.

Values are Z-scores derived from age-dependency in controls

TCPC no SND (n = 90) TCPC/SND no PM (n = 11) TCPC PM/SND (n = 12) ANOVA
p value
RR interval 0.20 (1.14) 3.11 (1.12)*,† 3.49 (1.76)*,† < 0.001
SD1 − 1.05 (1.67)* 1.34 (0.91)*,† 1.27 (0.96)*,† < 0.001
SD2 − 0.34 (1.67) 2.62 (1.11)*,† 1.53 (1.57)*,†,# < 0.001
SD1/SD2 −0.68 (0.95)* 0.04 (0.63)† 0.82 (1.25)*,†,# < 0.001
Ptot −1.39 (2.17)* 1.80 (0.94)*,† 0.87 (1.13) < 0.001
PVLF −1.09 (2.26)* 2.55 (0.98)*,† 1.11(1.38)*,†,# < 0.001
PLF −1.81 (2.67)* 1.59 (1.01) 0.88 (1.39) < 0.001
PHF −1.48 (1.91)* 0.88 (0.97) 0.45 (0.99) < 0.001
PLF/PHF 0.29 (0.93) − 0.10 (0.99) − 0.10 (1.01) 0.18

p values were derived from analysis of variance (ANOVA) post hoc tests

Inline graphic total power, PVLF power of very low frequency component, PLF power of low frequency component, PHF power of high frequency component, SD1 and SD2 Poincaré plot measures (see text for explanation), TCPC total cavopulmonary connection, SND sinus node dysfunction, PM pacemaker

*p < 0.05 versus controls

p < 0.05 versus TCPC without SND

#p = 0.06 TCPC/SND versus TCPC/SND/PM