Table 2.
Values are Z-scores derived from age-dependency in controls
| TCPC no SND (n = 90) | TCPC/SND no PM (n = 11) | TCPC PM/SND (n = 12) | ANOVA p value |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RR interval | 0.20 (1.14) | 3.11 (1.12)*,† | 3.49 (1.76)*,† | < 0.001 |
| SD1 | − 1.05 (1.67)* | 1.34 (0.91)*,† | 1.27 (0.96)*,† | < 0.001 |
| SD2 | − 0.34 (1.67) | 2.62 (1.11)*,† | 1.53 (1.57)*,†,# | < 0.001 |
| SD1/SD2 | −0.68 (0.95)* | 0.04 (0.63)† | 0.82 (1.25)*,†,# | < 0.001 |
| Ptot | −1.39 (2.17)* | 1.80 (0.94)*,† | 0.87 (1.13)† | < 0.001 |
| PVLF | −1.09 (2.26)* | 2.55 (0.98)*,† | 1.11(1.38)*,†,# | < 0.001 |
| PLF | −1.81 (2.67)* | 1.59 (1.01)† | 0.88 (1.39)† | < 0.001 |
| PHF | −1.48 (1.91)* | 0.88 (0.97)† | 0.45 (0.99)† | < 0.001 |
| PLF/PHF | 0.29 (0.93) | − 0.10 (0.99) | − 0.10 (1.01) | 0.18 |
p values were derived from analysis of variance (ANOVA) post hoc tests
total power, PVLF power of very low frequency component, PLF power of low frequency component, PHF power of high frequency component, SD1 and SD2 Poincaré plot measures (see text for explanation), TCPC total cavopulmonary connection, SND sinus node dysfunction, PM pacemaker
*p < 0.05 versus controls
†p < 0.05 versus TCPC without SND
#p = 0.06 TCPC/SND versus TCPC/SND/PM