Table 3.

Prevalence analysis stratified by education

Survey	Model A Low educated		Model B Medium educated		Model C High educated
Men
EU-Survey Income Living Conditions (EU-SILC)	1.00	Ref	1.00	Ref	1.00	Ref
European Health Interview Survey (EHIS)	1.07	[1.01, 1.13]	1.22	[1.13, 1.32]	1.31	[1.19, 1.42]
European Social Survey (ESS)	0.88	[0.81, 0.97]	0.97	[0.83, 1.11]	1.07	[0.95, 1.22]
n	119,290		180,158		87,563
Women
EU-Survey Income Living Conditions (EU-SILC)	1.00	Ref	1.00	Ref	1.00	Ref
European Health Interview Survey (EHIS)	1.15	[1.10, 1.21]	1.35	[1.16, 1.56]	1.36	[1.19, 1.54]
European Social Survey (ESS)	0.91	[0.83, 0.99]	0.97	[0.84, 1.12]	1.06	[0.81, 1.26]
n	156,327		190,606		98,505

Adjusted risk ratio of disability prevalence (between surveys) for the pooled dataset, stratified by education for men and women (ages 30–79) for 28 European countries (European Health Interview Survey 2006–2009; European Social Survey 2008, 2010, 2012; European Union Statistics on Income and Living conditions 2008, 2012)

Significance at the 5% level in bold

Models are stratified by sex and education

The models presented correspond to $\text{logit}\left(\text{Global}\text{Activity}\text{Limitation}\text{Indicator}-\text{GALI}\right)={\beta }_k{\text{Age}}_k+{\beta }_s{\text{Survey}}_s+{\beta }_c{\text{Country}}_c$

EHIS—European Health Interview Survey (2006/2009); ESS—European Social Survey (2008, 2010, 2012); EU-SILC—EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (2008, 2012) for 28 European countries (Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, the UK, Ireland, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, France, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece, Cyprus, Slovenia, Croatia Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia)