Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 26;64(3):461–474. doi: 10.1007/s00038-018-1174-7

Table 5.

Kendal’s Tau Correlations and associated p value comparing country rank agreement (risk ratio) between surveys (European Health Interview Survey 2006–2009; European Social Survey 2008, 2010, 2012; European Union Statistics on Income and Living conditions 2008, 2012) for prevalence and educational inequalities—based on country/survey pooled data (ages 30–79) for 28 European countries

Prevalence (Kendall’s taub and p value) Educational inequalities (Kendall’s Taub and p value)
Pair of Surveys Kendall’s Tau (− 1 to 1) p value n a Pair of surveys Kendall’s Tau (− 1 to 1) p value n a
Men Men
EU-SILC versus ESS 0.13 0.31 27 EU-SILC versus ESS − 0.06 0.67 27
EU-SILC versus EHIS − 0.16 0.42 15 EU-SILC versus EHIS 0.12 0.55 15
EHIS versus ESS 0.36 0.07 14 EHIS versus ESS 0.40 0.04 14
Women Women
EU-SILC versus ESS − 0.04 0.77 27 EU-SILC versus ESS − 0.03 0.86 27
EU-SILC versus EHIS 0.03 0.92 15 EU-SILC versus EHIS 0.25 0.19 15
EHIS versus ESS − 0.01 1.00 14 EHIS versus ESS 0.18 0.38 14

Significance in bold (p < 0.05)

EHIS—European Health Interview Survey (2006/2009); ESS—European Social Survey (2008, 2010, 2012); EU-SILC—EU Statistics on Income and Living Conditions (2008, 2012) for 28 European countries (Finland, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, the UK, Ireland, the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, France, Spain, Portugal, Italy, Greece, Cyprus, Slovenia, Croatia Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary, Poland, Bulgaria, Romania, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia)

a Countries without a pair are excluded from the rank comparison

bA value of − 1 indicates complete reversal between the two ranks being compared, 0 that the ranks are independent of each other, and 1 that they completely agree