Table 3.
Comparative analysis of study methods for the presence of Demodex mites in diagnostically significant amounts.
| Method | Identification of Demodex mites (>5 individuals per 1 cm2) | Patients diagnosed with rosacea (n=140; 66%) | Healthy people (n=72; 34%) | Total (n=212; 100%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scrape with subsequent | + | 60; 28.3% | 6; 2.8% | 66; 31.1% |
| light microscopy | - | 80; 37.7% | 66; 31.2% | 146; 68.9% |
| Method | Identification of Demodex mites (>5 individuals per 1 cm2) | Patients diagnosed with rosacea (n=140; 66%) | Healthy people (n=72; 34%) | People (n=212; 100%) |
| Confocal laser scanning | + | 80; 37.7% | 12; 5.7% | 92; 43.4% |
| in vivo microscopy | - | 60; 28.3% | 60; 28.3% | 88;56.6% |