Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 7;25(13):1592–1602. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i13.1592

Table 4.

Clinical characteristics of the patients treated with Hemospray and Endoclot for lower gastrointestinal bleeding n (%)

HS and EC (n = 17) Hemospray (n = 9) Endoclot (n = 7) P value
Sex (M) 15 8 6 ns
Age, yr 0.007
mean ± SD 67.8 ± 12.2 72.9 ± 9.2 65.6 ± 9.2
range 37-81 51-81 37-76
Application as ns
Primary therapy 10 (59) 5 (55) 4 (57.1)
Salvage therapy 7 (41.2) 4 (44) 3 (56)
Definite therapy after HP failure ns
Coiling 0 0 0
Surgery 1 (5.9) 0 1 (14)
Comorbidities
Coagulopathy 3 (17.6) 2 (22) 1 (14)
Renal insufficiency 6 (35.3) 3 (33) 3 (43)
Hemodialysis 3 (17.6) 2 (22) 1 (14)
Liver cirrhosis 2 (11.8) 2 (22) 0
Therapeutic anticoagulation 10 (59) 3 (33) 6 (86)
Dual antiplatet therapy 1 (5.9) 0 1 (43)
Vitamin K Antagonists 3 (17.6) 0 3 (43)
DOAC 3 (17.6) 0 2 (29)
Antiaggregation therapy 5 (29.4) 2 (22) 3 (43)
Short term success 12 (79.6) 6 (67) 5 (71) ns
Primary therapy 7 (70) 3/5 (60) 3/4 (75)
Salvage therapy 5 (71.4) 3/4 (75) 2/3 (67)
Long term success 10 (76.9) 6/7 (86) 3/5 (75) ns
Primary therapy 6 (75) 3/4(75) 2/3 (67)
Salvage therapy 4 (57.1) 3/3 (100) 1/2 (50)
Re-bleeding rate 7 (41.2) 3 (33) 4 (57) ns
Primary therapy 3 (30) 2/5 (40) 1/4 (25)
Salvage therapy 4 (57.1) 1/4 (25) 3/3 (100)

DOAC: Direct acting oral anticoagulant; HS: Hemospray; EC: Endoclot; HP: Hemostatic powders; HS and EC: Including patients who received both Hemospray and Endoclot at different time points.