Table 1.
Sample characteristics and associations with sexual minority stigma (N = 2087)
| n | % | M (SD) | Test statistica | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| City, Country | ||||
| Prague, Poland | 336 | 16.9 | 0.42 (0.81) | F(5, 1988) = 31.1, p < 0.001 |
| Bratislava, Slovakia | 349 | 17.5 | 0.00 (0.77) | |
| Barcelona, Spain | 312 | 15.6 | 0.47 (0.83) | |
| Bucharest, Romania | 305 | 15.3 | −0.19 (0.93) | |
| Ljubljana, Slovenia | 354 | 17.8 | 0.14 (0.91) | |
| Verona, Italy | 338 | 16.9 | −0.04 (0.86) | |
| Education | ||||
| Basic | 1151 | 57.7 | 0.14 (0.91) | F(2, 1991) = 0.42, p = 0.66 |
| University | 774 | 38.8 | 0.13 (0.84) | |
| Missing | 69 | 3.4 | 0.04 (0.96) | |
| Employment status | ||||
| Employed | 1481 | 74.3 | 0.14 (0.89) | F(2, 1991) = 0.62, p = 0.54 |
| Unemployed | 433 | 21.7 | 0.13 (0.86) | |
| Missing | 80 | 4.0 | 0.02 (0.94) | |
| Residential area | ||||
| Small city (population < 100,000) | 639 | 32.0 | 0.40 (0.90) | F(2, 1991) = 4.96, p < 0.01 |
| City (population > 100,000) | 1339 | 67.1 | 0.17 (0.87) | |
| Missing | 16 | 0.80 | 0.03 (1.11) | |
| Sexual identity | ||||
| Gay/homosexual | 1628 | 81.6 | 0.18 (0.85) | F(2, 1991) = 11.5, p < 0.001 |
| Bisexual or heterosexual | 343 | 17.2 | −0.07 (0.98) | |
| Missing | 23 | 1.15 | −0.003 (0.96) | |
| Steady partner in past 6 months | ||||
| No | 596 | 29.9 | 0.12 (0.86) | F(2, 1991) = 1.57, p = 0.21 |
| Yes | 1353 | 67.9 | 0.14 (0.89) | |
| Missing | 45 | 2.25 | −0.90 (1.0) | |
| M | SD | Range | ||
| Age (Mdn = 30.0; valid n = 2000) | 31.6 | 9.7 | 18–76 | r = −0.021, p = 0.37 |
a
ANOVA tests were used to test for differences across groups