Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 9;2017(6):CD007938. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007938.pub4

Gordh 2008.

Methods Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, cross‐over, not enriched. No imputation method mentioned
Titration over 2 weeks from 300 mg to maximum pain relief at a tolerable dose or 2400 mg daily, then stable dose for 3 weeks (5 weeks total); 3‐week washout, then cross‐over
Participants Peripheral nerve injury with pain ≥ 6 months. PI at randomisation > 30/100
N = 120 (efficacy analysis based on 98 who completed both treatment periods)
Mean age 49 years, 53% women
Initial pain intensity 53/100
Interventions Gabapentin 2400 mg daily (max)
Placebo
Mean daily dose of gabapentin 2243 mg ± 402 mg
Paracetamol ± codeine and dextropropoxyphene permitted as rescue medication
Analgesics and NSAIDs used by ˜ 50% during study
Outcomes ≥ 50% pain relief (weekly mean pain score)
≥ 30% pain relief
Marked pain relief (5‐point scale)
Marked or moderate pain relief (5‐point scale)
Adverse events
Withdrawals
Notes Oxford Quality Score: R = 2, DB = 2, W = 1, Total = 5
Sponsored by Parke‐Davis AB, later Pfizer AB
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Randomisation list was generated by the Clinical Pharmaceutical Operation Center in Freiburg
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Central, remote allocation, "sealed code envelope"
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "capsules that were identical in appearance"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Efficacy Unclear risk Imputation not mentioned
Size 
 Efficacy Unclear risk 50‐200 participants per treatment arm (98 completed both periods and included in efficacy analysis)