Skip to main content
. 2017 Jun 9;2017(6):CD007938. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007938.pub4

Rowbotham 1998.

Methods Multicentre, randomised, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel groups, no enrichment, LOCF
4‐week titration to maximum tolerated dose, or 3600 mg then stable dose for 4 weeks (8 weeks in total)
Participants PHN. Pain > 3 months after healing of rash, PI at randomisation ≥ 40/100
N = 229
Median age 73 years, 48% women
Initial average daily pain 6.4/10
Interventions Gabapentin 3600 mg daily (max), n = 113; (83% had ≥ 2400 mg daily)
Placebo, n = 116
Outcomes PGIC moderate or much improved
PGIC CTR moderate and much improved
No change in pain
SF36 and QoL
Adverse events
Withdrawals
Notes Oxford Quality Score: R = 1, DB = 2, W = 1, Total = 3
Parke‐Davies sponsored
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk "subject‐specific bottles based on randomisation schedule"
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk "identically appearing capsules"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 Efficacy Unclear risk LOCF imputation
Size 
 Efficacy Unclear risk 50‐200 participants per treatment arm (113, 116)