Table 3.
Pooled sample Salmonella result comparisons where Platinum and Control farms shared the same pig supplier
| Supplier ID | Farm type | % of samples Salmonella positive | Salmonella serovar (no. of isolates) | no. pigs from suppliera | % of pigs from supplier in a year |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | P | 0.0 | – | 30 | 100.0 |
| 1 | C | 0.0 | – | 13 | 100.0 |
| 1 | C | 33.3 | 4,12:i:- (3), 4,5,12:i:- (4), Derby (15), London (2), Newport (1), Reading (3) | 4 | 1.3 |
| 2 | P | 0.0 | – | 2400 | 100.0 |
| 2 | C | 2.8 | 4,5,12:i:- (4), Coeln (1) | 14 000 | 100.0 |
| 3 | P | 0.7 | Mbandaka (1) | 1 | 3.0 |
| 3 | P | 0.0 | – | 3 | 100.0 |
| 3 | C | 35.9 | Kedougou (46), Typhimurium (33) | 3 | 100.0 |
| 3 | C | 47.2 | London (16) | 2 | 100.0 |
| 3 | C | 33.3 | 4, 12:i:- (3), 4, 5, 12:i:- (4), Derby (15), London (2), Newport (1), Reading (3) | 8 | 2.7 |
| 4 | P | 2.2 | Kedougou (1), Derby (1) | 6 | 100.0 |
| 4 | C | 33.1 | 4, 12:i:- (15), Typhimurium (83) | 7 | 100.0 |
| 5 | P | 0.7 | Mbandaka (1) | 30 | 97.0 |
| 5 | C | 5.6 | Agama (3), Ajiobo (1), Derby (4), Stourbridge (1) | 130 | 100.0 |
| 6 | P | 0.0 | – | 160 | 90.8 |
| 6 | P | 8.7 | 4, 12:i:- (6) | 70 | 1.3 |
| 6 | C | 50.3 | Enteritidis (1), Kedougou (2), Typhimurium (69) | 60 | 100.0 |
| 7 | P | 8.7 | 4, 12:i:- (6) | 1 | <0.1 |
| 7 | C | 7.9 | 4, 12:i:- (17), Kedougou (10) | 6 | 0.4 |
| 8 | P | 0.0 | – | 16 | 9.2 |
| 8 | C | 7.9 | 4, 12:i:- (17), Kedougou (10) | 900 | 54.6 |
P, Platinum, C, Control.
aNumbers over 20 have been rounded to two significant figures.