Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 8;14(4):e0215068. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215068

Table 3. Diagnostic performance of the four commercial multiplex real-time PCR assays compared in the present study for the detection of Cryptosporidium hominis, Giardia duodenalis, and Entamoeba histolytica in artificially prepared DNA samples mimicking mixed infections.

Cycle-threshold values are shown.

Cryptosporidium hominis Giardia duodenalis Entamoeba histolytica
Combination Diagenode R-Biopharm Seegene Fast Track Diagenode R-Biopharm Seegene Fast Track Diagenode R-Biopharm Seegene Fast Track
1: Cr + G + Eh 28.9 28.9 30.3 33.5 32.0 38.7 39.1 30.2 Neg. 41.8 Neg. 30.4
2: Cr + G + Eh 38.6 31.3 34.4 Neg. 20.9 25.7 25.0 19.4 Neg. 38.7 Neg. 33.4
3: Cr + G + Eh Neg. Neg. Neg. Neg. 24.9 29.5 28.2 23.7 Neg. Neg. Neg. Neg.
4: Cr + G + Ed 37.6 29.1 33.4 Neg. 28.4 31.8 33.9 Neg.
5: Cr + G 26.7 25.9 27.0 34.2 23.8 27.8 27.7 29.4
6: Cr + G 28.0 27.5 28.6 Neg. 25.5 29.8 29.8 19.4
7: Cr + G 40.9 30.5 34.3 Neg. 31.5 32.6 Neg. 23.7
8: Cr + G Neg. 37.7 Neg. Neg. 26.8 29.6 30.1 26.8
9: Cr + G Neg. 29.7 32.6 Neg. 32.5 39.1 38.3 21.9
10: Cr + G 39.9 30.6 34.0 Neg. 27.6 32.3 31.9 24.9

Notes: ´Neg.´ refers to a negative detection in the presence of parasitic DNA; ´–´ refers to a negative detection in the absence of parasitic DNA; Cr, Cryptosporidium hominis; G, Giardia duodenalis; Eh, Entamoeba histolytica; Ed, Entamoeba dispar.