Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 2;10:300. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.00300

Table 1.

Summary of major candidate regions identified from the 150-kb windowed heterozygosity (HP) and fixation index (FST) values for each breed comparison (see Supplementary Tables S9–S27 for summary values of all candidate genes).

Gene Chromosome Position (Mb) Association Candidate SNP position PolyPhen Scores1 Selected breed
PDE6B 6 116.7–116.85 Decreased vision XM_027971363.1:c.C2284A/p.L762M 0.606 All five native breeds
XM_027971363.1:c.G2994C/p.A982P 0.973
PANK2 13 50.325–50.55
GMDS/FOXC1 20 50.1–50.325
T 8 87.525–87.825 Short tail XM_004011450.4:c.G334T/p.G112W 0.998 Altay Duolang
BMPR-IB 6 29.175–29.625 Litter size XM_027970721.1:c.A746G/p.Q249R 0.381 Hu
RXFP2 10 29.4–29.55 Absence of horns Duolang Hu
HOX gene cluster 4 68.7–68.925 Development of axial skeleton Mongolian
CYP17 22 22.425–22.575 Hypoxia adaptability NC_019479.2:g.22521501G > T Tibetan
MSRB3 3 153.975–154.125 Ear size Duolang
DNAJB5 2 53.1–53.25 Heat tolerance Duolang

1PolyPhen Scores were predicted by PolyPhen-2 software (Polymorphism Phenotyping V2), which indicated possible impact of an amino acid substitution on the structure and function of a protein.