Table 3.
EDFLIX total | EDFLIX-GF | EDFLIX-FoEx | EDFLIX-WeSh | |
---|---|---|---|---|
ED total (n = 207) | ||||
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.31** | 0.10 | 0.43** | 0.21** |
BRIEF-A shift | -0.62** | -0.68** | -0.37** | -0.33** |
EDDS symptom composite score | -0.08 | -0.10 | 0.05 | -0.21** |
Shape and weight (Item 3) | -0.34** | -0.24** | -0.23** | -0.43** |
Binge eating (Item 6) | 0.24** | 0.11 | 0.35** | 0.05 |
Compensatory behaviors (Items 13,14,16) | -0.25** | -0.19** | -0.18** | -0.28** |
AN (n = 114) | ||||
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.10 | 0.02 | 0.14 | 0.10 |
BRIEF-A shift | -0.57** | -0.61** | -0.34** | -0.30** |
EDDS symptom composite score | -0.20* | -0.21* | -0.05 | -0.25** |
Shape and weight (Item 3) | -0.43** | -0.29** | -0.36** | -0.46** |
Binge eating (Item 6) | 0.02 | -0.04 | 0.11 | -0.04 |
Compensatory behaviors (Items 13,14,16) | -0.22* | -0.23* | -0.09 | -0.23* |
BN (n = 61) | ||||
BMI (kg/m2) | 0.09 | -0.08 | 0.31* | -0.04 |
BRIEF-A shift | -0.73** | -0.76** | -0.45** | -0.31* |
EDDS symptom composite score | -0.31* | -0.17 | -0.25 | -0.35** |
Shape and weight (Item 3) | -0.39** | -0.24 | -0.25 | -0.52** |
Binge eating (Item 6) | -0.01 | -0.02 | 0.06 | -0.13 |
Compensatory behaviors (Items 13,14,16) | -0.40** | -0.19 | -0.45** | -0.32* |
BED (n = 32) | ||||
BMI (kg/m2) | -0.04 | -0.10 | 0.06 | -0.03 |
BRIEF-A shift | -0.74** | -0.82** | -0.37* | -0.49** |
EDDS symptom composite score | -0.52** | -0.28 | -0.54** | -0.45** |
Shape and weight (Item 3) | -0.18 | -0.12 | -0.05 | -0.38* |
Binge eating (Item 6) | 0.03 | 0.10 | 0.03 | -0.15 |
Compensatory behaviors (Items 13,14,16) | -0.64** | -0.39* | -0.70** | -0.40* |
BMI, body mass index; ED, eating disorder; AN, anorexia nervosa; BN, bulimia nervosa; BED, binge eating disorder; EDFLIX-GF, general flexibility (items 1–17); EDFLIX-FoEx, food and exercise flexibility (items 18–30); EDFLIX-WeSh, weight and shape flexibility (items 31–36). BRIEF Shift, the Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function Shift subscale. ∗∗Pearson’s correlation is significant at the 0.01 level, ∗Pearson’s correlation is significant at the 0.05 level; Pearson’s r effect sizes = small (0.10), medium (0.30), and large (0.50). Bold figures in the table mark r ≥ 0.30 (i.e., effect sizes medium and above).