Skip to main content
. 2019;19(1):69–78.

Table 2.

Data muscle strength of the studies Included in the Review.

Study Units Muscle strength ABDTHip LBP vs Control Muscle strength ADTHip LBP vs Control Muscle strength EXHip LBP vs Control Muscle strength FXHip LBP vs Control Muscle strength EXTKnee LBP vs Control Muscle strength FLXKnee LBP vs Control    Results
Bussey et al, 2016 Nm/ kg R (1.6 vs 1.7) L (1.5 vs 1.6) NA NA NA NA NA There is no difference in hip-abduction strength between LBP patients compared with healthy controls. (p=.843).
Cooper et al, 2015 MMT 0-5 AS (3.4 vs 4.5) US (4.6 vs 4.5) NA NA AS (4.8 vs 4.5) US (4.9 vs 4.5) NA NA Hip-abduction strength in affected side was significantly lower in LBP patients compared with healthy controls p<.001).
Cai & Kong, 2015 Nm/kg M (1.5 vs 1.5) F (1.1 vs 1.2) NA M (1.3 vs 1.5) F (1.3 vs 1.2) M (2.1 vs 2.6) F (2.0 vs 2.3) NA Knee extensor strength was significantly lower in LBP patients compared with healthy controls (p=.016).
Sutherlin & Hart, 2015 Nm/kg (1.6 vs 1.6) NA NA NA NA NA There is no difference in hip-abduction strength between LBP patients compared with healthy controls. (p=.944).
Penney et al, 2014 N/Kg R (1.0 vs 1.4) L (1.0 vs 1.2) NA NA NA NA NA Hip-abduction strength in right and left side were significantly lower in LBP patients compared with healthy controls (p<.05)
Yahia et al, 2011 Nm NA NA NA NA 60º (54.4 vs 103.7)
120º (48.5 vs 67.4)
60º (87.7 vs 124.6)
120º (71.1 vs 98.5)
Knee flexors and extensors strength at speeds 60 to 120ºs were significantly lower in LBP patients compared with healthy controls (p<0.05).
Arab et al, 2010 Kpa (27.5 vs 33.5) NA NA NA NA NA Hip-abduction strength in was significantly lower in LBP patients compared with healthy controls p<.001).
Kendall et al, 2010 N/kg² (6.6 vs 9.5) NA NA NA NA Hip-abduction strength in was significantly lower in LBP patients compared with healthy controls p<.05).
Marshal et al, 2010 Nm/kg NA NA NA NA NA C30 (0.9 vs 1.0)
C120 (0.7 vs 0.8)
E30 (1.2 vs 1.1)
E120 (1.1 vs 1.1)
There is no difference in hamstring concentric and eccentric strength at speeds 30 to 120ºs between LBP patients compared with healthy controls. (p>.05).
Tsai et al, 2010 Nm/kg R (1.4 vs 1.5) L (1.3 vs 1.6) R (1.2 vs 1.5) L (1.2 vs 1.6) R (2.6 vs 3.3) L (2.7 vs 3.3) R (0.6 vs 0.9) L (0.6 vs 0.8) NA NA Left hip-abduction and adduction strength in were significantly lower in LBP patients compared with healthy controls p<.05)
Marshal et al, 2009 Nm/kg NA NA NA NA NA C30 (0.9 vs 1.0)
C120 (0.7 vs 0.8)
E30 (1.2 vs 1.1)
E120 (1.1 vs 1.1)
There is no difference in hamstring absolute strength between LBP patients compared with healthy controls. (p=.843).
Bernard et al, 2008 min, seg NA NA (1min e 24 seg vs 2min e 20seg) NA (1min e 20seg vs 2min e 39seg) NA It was observed a statistically significantly difference in the endurance in hip extensors and quadriceps, which were weaker in the LBP group than their controls. The teenagers with LBP obtained 40% hip extensors´ values and 50% Killy´ values lower than in their control group.
Nourbakhsh & Arab, 2002 Kpa (26 vs 32) (23 vs 31) (22 vs 29) (36 vs 43) Hip- (abduction, flexion and extension) strength was significantly lower in LBP patients compared with healthy controls p<.05).
Lee et al, 1995 Nm NA NA NA NA (191.4 vs 264.7) (109.1 vs 176.3) Total knee strength was significantly lower in LBP patients compared with healthy controls (p=.016).

NA, Not assessed; R, right; L, left; M, male; F, female;, AS, affected side; US, unaffected side; GMED, gluteus medius; TFL, tensor fascia lata; GMAX, gluteus maximus: ITBI, Iliotibial Band Tightness; MMT, manual muscle test; C, concentric; E, Eccentric; C30 concentric at 30°/s; C60 concentric at 60°/s; C120 concentric at 120°/s; E30 Eccentric at 30°/s; E60 Eccentric at 60°/s; E120 Eccentric at 120°/s.