Table 2.

Statistical analysis of Fig. 3.

Data analysis		LogEC50			P value for Vmax comparison
		1:0	1:3	1:6	1:0 vs 1:3	1:0 vs 1:6	1:3 vs 1:6
3A	slMCa: slMRAP2	−9.22 ± 0.30	−9.61 ± 0.25	−9.59 ± 0.27	0.5695	<0.0001	0.0001
3B	slMCb: slMRAP2	−8.35 ± 0.28	−8.20 ± 0.39	−8.60 ± 0.23	<0.0001	<0.0001	0.0289
3C	slMCa: esMRAP2-C	−9.42 ± 0.28	−9.42 ± 0.28	−9.324 ± 0.27	0.0527	<0.0001	0.0003
3D	slMCb: esMRAP2-C	−8.64 ± 0.18	−8.13 ± 0.36	−8.62 ± 0.22	0.3386	0.0258	0.0103
3E	slMCa: zMRAP2a-C	−9.76 ± 0.34	−9.60 ± 0.25	−9.52 ± 0.20	<0.0001	<0.0001	0.6048
3F	slMCb: zMRAP2a-C	−8.44 ± 0.20	−8.63 ± 0.23	−8.74 ± 0.24	<0.0001	<0.0001	<0.0001
3G	slMCa: zMRAP2b-C	−9.41 ± 0.35	−9.49 ± 0.48	−9.79 ± 0.27	0.155	<0.0001	<0.0001
3H	slMCb: zMRAP2b-C	−8.46 ± 0.21	−8.18 ± 0.39	−8.65 ± 0.22	<0.0001	<0.0001	<0.0001

Two-way ANOVA with Tukey post-test was applied in the statistical analysis.