Table 3.
Statistical analysis of Fig. 5.
| Data analysis | LogIC50 | P value for Vmax comparison | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1:0 | 1:3 | 1:6 | 1:0 vs 1:3 | 1:0 vs 1:6 | 1:3 vs 1:6 | ||
| 5B | slMCb: slMRAP2 | −9.22 ± 0.63 | −9.11 ± 0.42 | 9.23 ± 0.26 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0518 |
| 5D | slMCb: esMRAP2-C | −9.17 ± 0.28 | −9.36 ± 0.47 | 9.18 ± 0.65 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.005 |
| 5F | slMCb: zMRAP2a-C | −9.24 ± 0.45 | −9.38 ± 0.64 | 9.39 ± 0.55 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | 0.0127 |
| 5H | slMCb: zMRAP2b-C | −9.32 ± 0.42 | −9.26 ± 0.62 | 8.73 ± 0.63 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 |
Two-way ANOVA with Tukey post-test was applied in the statistical analysis.
This work is licensed under a