Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 9;110(11):1190–1200. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djy161

Table 4.

Exercise intervention effects on outcomes for the total group and stratified per subgroup based on baseline standard deviation score, in case of statistically significant moderator effects of the baseline values

Outcome Overall effect
<1 SD below mean
1 SD below mean to mean
Mean to 1 SD above mean
>1 SD above mean
Ptrend*
n β (95% CI) n β (95% CI) n β (95% CI) n β (95% CI) n β (95% CI)
All studies
 Fatigue 3846 −0.17 (−0.22 to −0.12) 649 −0.03 (−0.13 to 0.08) 1430 −0.17 (−0.25 to −0.09) 1124 −0.20 (−0.30 to −0.11) 643 −0.22 (−0.37 to −0.07) <.001
 Physical function 3984 0.18 (0.13 to 0.23) 649 0.27 (0.11 to 0.42) 890 0.22 (0.11 to 0.34) 1727 0.19 (0.12 to 0.25) 718 0.03 (−0.07 to 0.12) <.001
During cancer treatment
 Aerobic fitness 1374 0.25 (0.18 to 0.33) 211 0.07 (−0.12 to 0.26) 510 0.20 (0.09 to 0.31) 453 0.32 (0.22 to 0.43) 200 0.38 (0.15 to 0.60) <.001
 Upper body muscle strength 1106 0.25 (0.16 to 0.35)
 Lower body muscle strength 1019 0.29 (0.20 to 0.37)
 Quality of life 1914 0.15 (0.07 to 0.22)
Post cancer treatment
 Aerobic fitness 843 0.33 (0.24 to 0.41)
 Upper body muscle strength 904 0.10 (0.04 to 0.15) 168 0.21 (0.12 to 0.30) 458 0.19 (0.13 to 0.25) 180 −0.04 (−0.16 to 0.08) 98 −0.06 (−0.17 to 0.06) <.001
 Lower body muscle strength 646 0.26 (0.18 to 0.34) 89 0.38 (0.25 to 0.51)‡ 363 0.30 (0.21 to 0.39) 129 0.20 (−0.01 to 0.40)§ 65 0.03 (−0.33 to 0.40) <.001
 Quality of life 1960 0.15 (0.09 to 0.21) 311 0.36 (0.17 to 0.55) 538 0.19 (0.06 to 0.32) 741 0.12 (0.03 to 0.21) 370 −0.02 (−0.13 to 0.08) .01
*

P value of the two-sided trend test. CI = confidence intervals; df = degrees of freedom; SD = standard deviation.

Higher scores on the fatigue scale indicate more fatigue.

P ≤ .05, P value of the two-sided linear mixed model analyses Analyses are adjusted for age, sex, and cancer type.

§

.05 < P ≤ .10. P value of the two-sided linear mixed model analyses. Analyses are adjusted for age, sex, and cancer type.