Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 2;10:328. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00328

Table 2.

The modified Newcastle–Ottawa quality assessment scale.

Study Sample size Severe case Mortality Study type Modified Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale
Selection Comparability Outcome Sum
S1 S2 S3 S4 C1 O1.1 O1.2 O2 O3
Abou-Assi et al., 2002 156 5 14 Prospective 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Albulushi et al., 2014 174 14 0 Retrospective 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 6
Gomez Beltran et al., 2013 24 1 0 Retrospective 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 8
de-Madaria et al., 2014 403 28 17 Prospective 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 7
Dombernowsky et al., 2016 359 nd 13 Retrospective 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 8
Gompertz et al., 2012 128 nd 2 Retrospective 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 6
Gompertz et al., 2013 1367 nd 115 Retrospective 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 7
Gonzalez-Gonzalez et al., 2012 605 nd 30 Prospective 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
Gornik et al., 2013 1058 210 41 Prospective 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 6
Gürleyik et al., 2005 55 13 1 Prospective 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
Karpavicius et al., 2016 102 20 5 Prospective 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 7
Knoepfli et al., 2007 310 63 8 Prospective 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 8
Lautz et al., 2011 211 nd 0 Retrospective 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 8
Milheiro et al., 1995 91 nd 10 Retrospective 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 5
Mole et al., 2016 2053 390 102 Retrospective 1 1 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 6
Muller et al., 2006 109 66 8 Prospective 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
Nijmeijer et al., 2013 622 119 20 Prospective 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 5
Ocampo et al., 2015 854 140 nd Prospective 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Pant et al., 2014 55012 nd 509 Retrospective 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Parniczky et al., 2016 600 53 17 Prospective 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
Radenkovic et al., 2009 91 24 8 Prospective 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 7
Rashidi and Røkke, 2016 670 43 37 Prosp and Retrosp 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 8
Spanier et al., 2013 78257 nd 9515 Retrospective 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Uomo et al., 2007 1173 167 36 Prospective 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 8
De Waele et al., 2007 40 14 6 Retrospective 1 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 7
Wang et al., 2015 120 31 13 Retrospective 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 5
Ho et al., 2015 12284 765 nd Retrospective 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 4
Weitz et al., 2016 346 21 12 Retrospective 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 8
Wu et al., 2008 36178 nd 569 Retrospective 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Yeung et al., 1996 43 nd 1 Retrospective 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 1 6
Yue et al., 2015 169 68 nd Prospective 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 5
Zhang et al., 2016 974 223 58 Retrospective 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 8
Zuidema et al., 2014 64 11 3 Prospective 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 5

Ranks in three categories (green-1: low risk; red-0: high risk, yellow-0: unclear risk) are shown. S1, non-selected etiology AP; S2, all participants have an AP diagnosis; S3, AP diagnosis is confirmed using the latest guidelines; S4, non-selected severity cases. C1: comparability defined by exact age ranges in years. O1.1, severity assigned according to the latest guidelines; O1.2, described mortality (in-hospital and pancreas-related); O2–O3, adequate follow-up for outcome occurrence morality and severity.