Table 5.
Test results of the two models with post-processing rules
| Approach | Strict index (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P | R | F1 | |
| BiLSTM-CRF | 87.66 | 85.72 | 86.68 |
| BiLSTM-CRF + rule | 89.43 | 87.47 | 88.44 |
| Attention-BiLSTM-CRF | 87.75 | 86.77 | 87.26 |
| Attention-BiLSTM-CRF + rule | 89.61 | 88.58 | 89.09 |
Test results of the two models with post-processing rules
| Approach | Strict index (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| P | R | F1 | |
| BiLSTM-CRF | 87.66 | 85.72 | 86.68 |
| BiLSTM-CRF + rule | 89.43 | 87.47 | 88.44 |
| Attention-BiLSTM-CRF | 87.75 | 86.77 | 87.26 |
| Attention-BiLSTM-CRF + rule | 89.61 | 88.58 | 89.09 |