Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 8;19:83. doi: 10.1186/s12906-019-2490-z

Table 3.

Details of the treatment options selected by the participants by type of illness

Treatment options selected in participants with All illnesses Mental illnesses Somatic illnesses
N (%) N (%) N (%)
Single choice options
1- Strictly conventional 43 (10.2) 65 (11.2) 49 (8.7)
2- Weak complementary 319 (75.8) 402 (69.3) 408 (72.1)
3- Strong complementary 50 (11.9) 83 (14.3) 93 (16.6)
4- Alternative 9 (2.1) 30 (5.2) 15 (2.7)
Total 421 (100.0) 580 (100.0) 565 (100.0)
Two choice options
1 + 2 51 (12.9) 37 (13.1) 44 (14.2)
1 + 3 1 (0.3) 1 (0.4) 3 (1.0)
1 + 4 6 (1.5) 5 (1.8) 7 (2.3)
2 + 3 291 (73.5) 200 (70.9) 214 (68.8)
2 + 4 33 (8.3) 21 (7.5) 27 (8.7)
3 + 4 14 (3.5) 18 (6.4) 16 (5.1)
Total 396 (100.0) 282 (100.0) 311 (100.0)
Three choice options
1 + 2 + 3 11 (14.1) 5 (14.3) 6 (26.1)
1 + 2 + 4 22 (28.2) 7 (20.0) 5 (21.7)
1 + 3 + 4 2 (2.6) 1 (2.9) 0 (0.0)
2 + 3 + 4 43 (55.1) 22 (62.9) 12 (52.2)
Total 78 (100.0) 35 (100.0) 23 (100.0)
All combinations including
Strictly conventional 97 (20.3) 58 (18.2) 65 (19.5)
Weak complementary 455 (95.2) 294 (92.2) 308 (92.2)
Strong complementary 366 (76.6) 249 (78.1) 251 (75.2)
Alternative 124 (25.9) 76 (23.8) 67 (20.1)

Note: N indicate the number of participants who selected the distinct presented options/combinations of treatment. This number refers to all clinical vignettes (column All illnesses), to mental illnesses only (column Mental illnesses) or to somatic illnesses only (column Somatic illnesses)

The lower part of the table indicates the total number of participants that selected combinations of treatment including one of the existing options (either strictly conventional, weak complementary, strong complementary and alternative) at least once