Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 8;19:83. doi: 10.1186/s12906-019-2490-z

Table 4.

Percentage of treatment options and rating scores associated with each treatment option

Categorical variables (% per raws) Strictly conventional (C) Weak complementary (W) Strong complementary (S) Alternative
frequency of relapse high 9.45 64.24 21.44 4.87
low 9.40 60.96 23.30 6.34
intensity of symptoms high 9.48 64.79 20.88 4.84
low 9.37 60.40 23.86 6.37
type of illness mental 10.23 61.54 21.58 6.65
somatic 8.62 63.65 23.16 4.56
education level <  9 years 10.61 62.21 23.26 3.92
O level 8.44 62.42 24.51 4.63
A level 9.28 61.50 22.17 7.06
University and above 10.25 63.78 19.96 6.01
employment status working 8.85 62.85 22.87 5.43
pupil / student 12.90 54.26 23.94 8.91
retired 9.40 65.27 18.69 6.64
unemployed 5.77 71.39 21.63 1.20
other 12.50 60.74 22.66 4.10
Linear variables Strictly conventional (C) Weak complementary (W) Strong complementary (S) Alternative
distress M 5.19 5.50 5.18 4.39
(range 1–7) SD (1.30) (1.25) (1.36) (1.49)
treatability M 2.85 2.92 2.78 2.14
(range 1–5) SD (0.73) (0.67) (0.69) (0.75)
social stigma M 2.44 2.38 2.25 2.15
(range 1–5) SD (0.92) (0.90) (0.93) (0.89)
belief in efficacy of M 1.63 2.04 2.48 2.40
complementary treatments (range 1–5) SD (0.67) (0.66) (0.66) (0.86)
belief in efficacy of M 3.12 3.27 3.01 2.32
conventional treatments (range 1–5) SD (0.74) (0.61) (0.67) (0.92)