Table 3.

Comparison of the hybrid mass uncertainties for the all-jets and lepton+jets [17] channels, as well as the combination. The signs of the shifts follow the convention of Tables 1 and 2

	$\delta m_{\mathrm{t}}^{\text{hyb}}\text{[GeV]}$
	All-jets	$\ell$+jets	Combination
Experimental uncertainties
Method calibration	0.06	0.05	0.03
JEC (quad. sum)	0.15	0.18	0.17
Intercalibration	$-$ 0.04	$+$ 0.04	+ 0.04
MPFInSitu	$+$ 0.08	$+$ 0.07	+ 0.07
Uncorrelated	$+$ 0.12	$+$ 0.16	+ 0.15
Jet energy resolution	$-$ 0.04	$-$ 0.12	$-$ 0.10
$\mathrm{b}$ tagging	0.02	0.03	0.02
Pileup	$-$ 0.04	$-$ 0.05	$-$ 0.05
All-jets background	0.07	$-$	0.01
All-jets trigger	$+$ 0.02	$-$	+ 0.01
$\ell$+jets background	–	$+$ 0.02	$-$ 0.01
Modeling uncertainties
JEC flavor (linear sum)	$-$ 0.34	$-$ 0.39	$-$ 0.37
light quarks (uds)	$+$ 0.07	$+$ 0.06	+ 0.07
charm	$+$ 0.02	$+$ 0.01	+ 0.02
bottom	$-$ 0.29	$-$ 0.32	$-$ 0.31
gluon	$-$ 0.13	$-$ 0.15	$-$ 0.15
$\mathrm{b}$ jet modeling (quad. sum)	0.09	0.12	0.06
$\mathrm{b}$ frag. Bowler–Lund	$-$ 0.07	$-$ 0.05	$-$ 0.05
$\mathrm{b}$ frag. Peterson	$-$ 0.05	$+$ 0.04	$-$ 0.02
semileptonic $\mathrm{b}$ hadron decays	$-$ 0.03	$+$ 0.10	$-$ 0.04
PDF	0.01	0.02	0.01
Ren. and fact. scales	0.04	0.01	0.01
ME/PS matching	$+$ 0.24	$-$ 0.07	+ 0.07
ME generator	$-$	$+$ 0.20	+ 0.21
ISR PS scale	$+$ 0.14	$+$ 0.07	+ 0.07
FSR PS scale	$+$ 0.18	$+$ 0.13	+ 0.12
Top quark $p_{\mathrm{T}}$	$+$ 0.03	$-$ 0.01	$-$ 0.01
Underlying event	$+$ 0.17	$-$ 0.07	$-$ 0.06
Early resonance decays	$+$ 0.24	$-$ 0.07	$-$ 0.07
CR modeling (max. shift)	$-$ 0.36	$+$ 0.31	+ 0.33
“gluon move” (ERD on)	$+$ 0.32	$+$ 0.31	+ 0.33
“QCD inspired” (ERD on)	$-$ 0.36	$-$ 0.13	$-$ 0.14
Total systematic	0.70	0.62	0.61
Statistical (expected)	0.20	0.08	0.07
Total (expected)	0.72	0.63	0.61