Table 2.
Literature | Significant increase in anastomotic complications? | Significant increase in total infectious complications? |
---|---|---|
Narula et al. (2013) [75] | Not separately examined | Yes, RR = 1.93 (95% CI: 1.28–2.89) |
El-Hussuna et al. (2013) [76] | Yes (low bias studies), RR = 1.63 (95% CI: 1.03–2.60) No (medium bias studies), RR = 0.17 (95% CI: 0.05–0.60) | No, RR = 1.15 (95% CI: 0.86–1.53) |
Kopylov et al. (2012) [77] | No, OR =1.18 (95% CI: 0.61–2.30) | No, OR = 1.62 (95% CI: 0.92–2.86) |
Billioud et al. (2013) [78] | Not separately examined | Yes, OR = 1.45 (95% CI: 1.03–2.05) |
Waterland et al. (2016) [79] | No, OR = 1.19 (95% CI: 0.82–1.71) | Yes, OR = 1.52 (95% CI: 1.14–2.03) |
Yang et al. (2014) [80] | Not separately examined | Yes, OR = 1.47 (95% CI: 1.08–1.99) |
OR, odds ratio; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval.