Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar 8;8(1):354–365. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2019.1584018

Table 3. Drug susceptible analysis of representative HBV strains.

Viral strain Entecavir Tenofovir
EC50 (μmol/L) Fold EC50 (μmol/L) Fold
Wild-type 1 0.004 ± 0.006 1.0 1.828 ± 0.926 1.0
rtL180M+A181C+M204V 0.357 ± 0.083 85.6 5.453 ± 1.004 3.0
rtL180M+A181C+M204V+M250V 1.487 ± 0.219 356.1 4.927 ± 0.971 2.7
rtL180M+A181C+S202G+M204V 1.282 ± 0.495 307.1 5.904 ± 2.062 3.2
rtL180M+A181V+M204V 0.060 ± 0.035 15.0 13.002 ± 3.584 7.1
rtL180M+M204V(lab) 0.075 ± 0.036 17.9 3.090 ± 0.928 1.7
Wild-type 2 0.003 ± 0.001 1.0 0.710 ± 0.220 1.0
rtL180M+S202G+M204V 0.413 ± 0.454 137.7 1.548 ± 0.328 2.2
rtL180M+T184A+M204V 0.331 ± 0.744 110.4 1.426 ± 0.306 2.0

Notes: EC50: the 50% effective concentration of drug. Fold: the EC50 of mutant/the EC50 of wild-type. Wild-type 1 and four subsequent mutant strains were derived from serial serum samples of an rtA181C-positive patient. rtL180M+M204V(lab) was a laboratory strain created by eliminating rtA181C mutation from the rtL180M+A181C+M204V mutant. Wild-type 2 and two subsequent classical entecavir-resistance mutant strains were derived from another entecavir-refractory patient.