Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 9.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2018 Jun 12;56(3):406–413.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.06.003

Appendix Table 2:

Percent agreement between raters

Agreement in response to the question: “Is this patient’s goal potentially achievable?”
Rater

a – PGY5 b – PGY8 c – PGY6 d – PGY9 e – PGY5 f – PGY5
a – PGY5 n = 98
b – PGY8 79% n = 101
c – PGY6 87% 82% n = 98
d – PGY9 78% 73% 80% n = 99
e – PGY5 77% 69% 91% 80% n = 103
f – PGY5 83% 69% 78% 76% 77% n = 104
Does the intervention meet the definition of goal-concordant carea for this patient?
a– PGY5 b – PGY8 c – PGY6 d – PGY9 e – PGY5 f – PGY5

a – PGY5 n = 98
b – PGY8 74% n = 101
c – PGY6 80% 74% n = 98
d – PGY9 73% 59% 80% n = 99
e – PGY5 69% 60% 86% 80% n = 103
f – PGY5 75% 60% 76% 71% 70% n = 104
a

Interventions are defined as being goal-concordant if the rater selected “Yes or maybe” in response to the question “Is this patient’s goal achievable?” and the question “Will performing this intervention, or continuing to use this intervention help achieve the patient’s goal?”