Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 12;23(2):267–276. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1854-5

Table 4.

Comparisons of perioperative data between mesh repair group and non-mesh repair group

Variables Mesh repair group (n = 43) Non-mesh repair group (n = 21) p value
Anesthetic methods, n (%) 0.001*
 Local 3 (7.0) 1 (4.8)
 Spinal 28 (65.1) 4 (19.0)
 General 12 (27.9) 16 (76.2)
Operation time (min), mean ± SD 87.4 ± 17.8 125.5 ± 38.5 < 0.001*
Enterectomy, n (%) 1 (2.3) 9 (42.9) < 0.001*
Postoperative complications, n (%) 12 (27.9) 14 (66.7) 0.003*
 Incisional seroma 9 (20.9) 10 (47.6) 0.028*
 Incisional infection 1 (2.3) 3 (14.3) 0.099
 Scrotal swelling 5 (11.6) 8 (38.1) 0.001*
 Mesh infection 1 (2.3) 0 NA
 Urine retention 3 (7.0) 3 (14.3) 0.385
Postoperative LOS (days), M (95%CI) 5 (3.8–6.0) 8 (5.0–8.0) 0.026*
Follow-up period (months), M (95%CI) 32 (24.5–46.8) 32 (22.4–53.2) 0.672
Recurrence rate, % (n/N) 2.3 (1/43) 19.0 (4/21) 0.019*
Overall mortality rate, % (n/N) 7.0 (3/43) 9.5 (2/21) 0.721

NA not available, M median value, CI confidential interval, SD standard deviation, LOS length of stay, N total number

*Statistically significant