Table 2.
Quantitative analysis results for three representative multi-spectral images
FCM | FCM_S | KFCM | SPOFCM | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Case 1 | ||||
Accuracy | 78.35 | 81.08 | 81.16 | 84.12 |
Specificity | 79.14 | 81.01 | 70.14 | 83.14 |
FAR | 16.78 | 28.01 | 30.04 | 16.72 |
Case 2 | ||||
Accuracy | 77.24 | 81.15 | 90.22 | 98.74 |
Specificity | 75.13 | 80.17 | 82.14 | 99.74 |
FAR | 15.01 | 8.02 | 5.24 | 0.21 |
Case 3 | ||||
Accuracy | 78.35 | 84.44 | 86.17 | 90.51 |
Specificity | 79.14 | 83.01 | 88.11 | 91.18 |
FAR | 17.01 | 14.47 | 13.11 | 8.9 |
Italic representation indicates the better values