Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 3;9:202. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2019.00202

Table 4.

The effect of HPV genotyping testing in triaging women with ASCUS.

Triage criteria using HR-HPV types Sensitivity Specificity PPV NPV Referral rate (%)
%(n/N) 95%CI %(n/N) 95%CI %(n/N) 95%CI %(n/N) 95%CI
CIN2+
HPV16/18 65.5 (19/29) 47.3, 80.1 91.2 (332/364) 87.9, 93.7 37.3 (19/51) 25.3, 51.0 97.1 (332/342) 94.7, 98.4 13.0
HPV16/18/52 79.3 (23/29) 61.6, 90.2 82.4 (300/364) 78.2, 86.0 26.4 (23/87) 18.3, 36.6 98.0 (300/306) 95.8, 99.1 14.8
HPV16/18/52/58 89.7 (26/29) 73.6, 96.4 77.2 (281/364) 72.6, 81.2 23.9 (26/109) 16.8, 32.7 99.0 (282/285) 97.0, 99.6 21.9
HPV16/18/33/52/58 93.1 (27/29) 78.04, 98.09 75.8 (276/364) 71.2, 79.9 23.5 (27/115) 16.7, 32.0 99.3 (277/279) 97.4, 99.8 29.3
HR-HPV 96.6 (28/29) 82.8, 99.4 68.7 (250/364) 63.7, 73.2 19.7 (28/142) 14.0, 27.0 99.6 (250/364) 97.8, 99.9 36.1

CIN2+, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse; 95% CI, 95% confidence interval; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; ASCUS, atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.