Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2019 Mar 1;104(3):785–792. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-01933

Table 3.

The Relationship between Imaging and Thyroid Cancer Incidence: Analysis at the Regional Subgroup Level

Linear Mixed Effects and Model
Estimates
Regional
Subgroup
Mean per
Year*
Estimate
(Standard Error)
P-value
Intercept −4.18 (2.53) 0.10
Imaging
  None 90.2% REF
  Other Imaging 9.2% −1.88 (1.15) 0.10
  Thyroid Ultrasound 0.6% 26.19 (6.37) <0.001
Time (Year) 0.01 (0.01) 0.14
Age 76 0.08 (0.04) 0.04
Sex
  Male 42.3% REF
  Female 57.7% −1.53 (1.14) 0.18
Race
  White 87.2% REF
  Black 7.7% 0.02 (0.29) 0.95
  Other 5.1% −0.32 (0.27) 0.23
Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Index 1.5 0.19 (0.12) 0.13
Rural-Urban Continuum
  Metro 47.1% REF
  Adjacent to Metro 30.7% −0.02 (0.06) 0.68
  Not Adjacent to Metro 22.2% 0.00 (0.06) 0.98
Education High School or Above 84.6% −0.58 (0.49) 0.24
Median Household Income $48,381 0.03 (0.03) 0.23
*

The regional subgroup mean per year is the aggregate of the means from the 153 regional subgroups.