Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Apr 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Soc Work Pract Addict. 2017 Apr 12;17(1-2):10–35. doi: 10.1080/1533256X.2017.1302887

Table 3.

Difference-in-Differences Estimates of Service Use and Perceived Unmet Need for Black, Hispanic, and Asian Adults with Heavy/Binge Drinking, by Gender

Post-ACA: 2011–2014 (vs. 2008–2009) Sub-Analysis
Post ACA: 2014 (vs. 2011–2013)
Black (vs. White) Hispanic (vs. White) Asian (vs. White) Black (vs. White) Hispanic (vs. White) Asian (vs. White)
Outcome DiD Estimatea (%) 95% CI DiD Estimatea (%) 95% CI DiD Estimatea (%) 95% CI DiD Estimatea (%) 95% CI DiD Estimatea (%) 95% CI DiD Estimatea (%) 95% CI
Women
 SUD treatment 0.72 −0.64 2.09 0.48 −0.64 1.44 1.19 −0.78 3.18 −0.03 −1.19 1.11
 MH treatment 0.35 −3.92 4.61 1.95 −2.42 6.39 2.94 −4.13 10.02 −1.23 −6.66 4.19 −2.60 −7.78 2.57 −3.79 −13.66 6.09
 Unmet need-SUD treatment 1.02* 0.14 1.91 −0.26 −1.12 0.60 −1.32* −2.52 −0.13 −0.15 −0.53 0.230
 Unmet need-MH treatment 1.76 −1.16 4.67 1.45 −1.27 4.17 1.23 −3.46 5.91 −3.42 −7.40 0.55 −0.35 −3.55 2.85 −2.36 −6.68 1.97
Men
 SUD treatment −1.19 −3.62 1.25 0.76 −0.41 1.93 1.45 −0.94 0.038 −0.66 −1.97 0.7
 MH treatment −1.48 −4.71 1.75 −0.04 −2.45 2.37 −7.10** −12.40 −1.78 −2.40 −6.15 1.34 1.05 −2.40 4.53 −5.08** −9.32 −0.83
 Unmet need-SUD treatment −1.65* −3.30 −0.001 −0.45 −1.23 0.33 1.12* 0.07 0.02 0.85 −0.27 1.98
 Unmet need-MH treatment 0.44 −1.05 1.93 0.80 −0.38 1.97 3.01 −0.35 6.37 0.45 −1.43 2.32 −2.06** −3.67 −0.45 2.09 −3.56 7.73
*

p<.05,

**

p<.01,

***

p<.001

Note: All models controlled for predisposing, enabling and need variables. The models estimating unmet needs for SUD treatment and MH treatment also controlled for past-year SUD treatment and past-year MH treatment, respectively.

a

The Difference-in-Differences (DiD) estimates are derived from the b coefficients (i.e., probabilities) from the regression models and presented as percentage points.